- IdahoStatesman.com
- Blogs
- Bronco Beat
- Murph's Turf
- Varsity Extra
- Idaho Newsreader
- Inside Idaho Business
- Commentary: Kevin Richert
- Your Local Government
- Letters from the West
- Into the Outdoors
- Words & Deeds
- The Beer Nut: Patrick Orr
- What's Online
- Nonprofits
- TechIdaho
- The Cinemaniac
- Idaho Politics: LiCalzi
- Idaho Legislature: Labrador
- Idaho Legislature: Langhorst
- Forums
- Recent Posts
- Content
Iraq war
Submitted by VbroncoAfanB on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 4:04am.
There's a forum for people to post messages to soldiers, but no place to actually discuss the war - what are your thoughts on the Iraq war?
-Why are we in this war?
-Should we "stay the course"?
-What would a pull-out of the troops do to the infrastructure of the current governing regime?
-If you are pro-Iraq War, why?
-If you are anti-Iraq War, why?
Sound off!

Iran/Iraq
I saw the show Frontline (PBS) last night. It was about recent US/Iran relations . Some interesting stuff!
If you thought you had a solid opinion on the Iraq war, watch that edition (pbs.org) and see if it changes your mind to some degree.
I'll check it out.
Thank you, I'll have to check that out.
To this day no one can or will answer my questions. These are honest questions. I really do want an answer, I'm not just trying to put people on for the sake of arguement.
If anyone can, here are my questions:
1) Why are we in Iraq?
2) What does "victory in Iraq" mean?
3) Is "victory" possible?
4) How do we know when we've achieved "victory"?
5) How does any of the above justify our tax dollars and the lives of our greatest asset - our young American citizens?
6) How do we withdraw troops safely and successfully?
7) What will happen in post-US-withdraw Iraq?
Any takers? I used to support the war, but I simply cannot understand our reason for being there right now. We've worn out our welcome (if we had any in the first place). We are dumping lives and tax dollars into a lost cause. I also don't understand how the political party that is supposed to be fiscally responsible has created a spending problem and a defecit that is growing exponentially. How do you explain that?
...Vbron...
Victory = ????
VbroncoAfanB, Being a Ron Paul supporter you should know part of the answer to your own question. Without a "Declaration of War" there can be no true victory, because there will never be a surrender or a declaration of peace by way of a treaty. The conflict will linger until the powers to be have decided they have nothing more to gain from it.
*wink*
Oh I undrstand that, I'm just wondering if anyone else did!
Thanks for that reminder. True true true!
...Vbron...
VbroncoAfanB
This disastrous foreign policy will continue until the instigator - George Bush is out of power . Then it will take a while for the Democratic president to untangle this mess .
All this talk about surrender is nonsense -------- you claim to be a bronco fan -- is that how it ends ? One team surrenders ?
You watch to much TV , in the real world it doesn't always work like that .
Reddog
Where did you get
that I was suggesting surrender? Pretty sure I never did. I agree that GWB needs to be ousted, but electing a Dem into office is jumping out of the frying pan...
The Dems won't get us out of this mess either. It's good for certain business, and they are bought off just like the Republicans. You watch too much TV. Anyone that thinks either political party is going to fix this mess is dillusional.
!!!Vote Vbron for President, 2020!!!
power
You make me laugh. A DEM is not going to win. LOL. Do you really think we want our taxes to go up. The Dems through out history have screwd up all the time. Look at the polls. The House is the lowest ever, there ya go vote for them. Look at what they are doing.
Our taxes are going to go up next year $2000 because they can not get their heads screwd on right. This years taxes 38 million people are not going to get theirs on time. Read the news its all over the place. And President Bushes polls are soaring. He was right all along. I used to be a DEM now I got smart and proud of it. I hope Mcain wins. Smarter more history and he just has more experience,
to be our next President.
The questions your asking are not honest, there re-hash
Vbron,
Your questions have been asked and answered several times by the President and others if you've been listening. You may not like the President's answer or his reasons but he's the commander in chief, not me and not you. President Bush is in a position to know more than we do because he is the C in C.
Your questions are not honest because they show a dis-trust of the leaders that "WE THE PEOPLE" elected to lead this country. Your questions show just how effective the drive-by media has been in their distortion and spin of the news, and lack of reporting American victories in the war on terror. There's been more reporting in the drive by media of terrorists attacks than American victories. A more relavent question is, who's side is the media on? According to the reporting, the american media is on the side of the terrorists, prove me wrong.
The recent "surge" in troop strengh has been very effective in defeating the terrorists and establishing trust among the people of Iraqi and Afghanistan. Recently, the tribal leaders of the anwar province of Iraq declared that "Your blood is our blood, we will fight beside you". Where did you hear that in the news? No where, except Foxnews and CNN, and CNN only reported it a couple of times during the day, instead of every hour on the hour like they do everything else.
1) Why are we in Iraq? Asked and answered.
2) What does "victory in Iraq" mean? Peace.
3) Is "victory" possible? Yes.
4) How do we know when we've achieved "victory"?
Al Queda, hezbola, himas, Iran, North Korea, and other terrorist organizations surrender.
5) How does any of the above justify our tax dollars and the lives of our greatest asset - our young American citizens? Have you forgotten what FDR said before congress after Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941? Have you forgotten what President Bush said before congress after the attacks on our country on September 11, 2001? You must have to ask a question like this.
6) How do we withdraw troops safely and successfully?
We were over 60 years in Germany and we're still in Korea; it doesn't take much to figure out the answer. How ever long it takes!
7) What will happen in post-US-withdraw Iraq? This could be the only question you've got that's worth discussing. No one can be 100% certain what post war Iraq will look like. I would hope that they could stand on their own two feet; like Isreal does against the Palistinians.
Later days,
Viper
P.S. Spin away little red puppy dog.
Viper
You Wrote : Navigator wrote: Viper, I appreciate the comment on being young, maybe comparatively I am. As far as being ignorant of warfare, I'll admit that i've never participated in war, but I have been in the military and I have taught American and European history as the college level, so I'm not completely without reference (I'm also quite good, if I do say so myself, at strategy war games and chess for what that's worth).
The problem with the "big hammer" approach to conflicts like this is that it simply does not work unless you are willing and prepared to completely level or mow down the region. That simply is not going to happen in this case. Because this war was entered into with half-baked ideas and absolutely no for sight the problems faced now are far too complex for this president and his simple minded approach. Without true international efforts, and I think you know what I mean by that, I don't think the solution is within grasp.
The simple fact that the president's strategy, and apparantely yours, was/is dependent upon cooperation from the very people whose country we invaded and occupied just really shows how poorly managed this war was/is.
By the way, it was the president himself and the administration that proclaimed that this war would be quick and easy.
Of course this whole discussion is under the wrong-headed assumption that the invasion of Iraq was justified in the first place.
My answer: Actually Nav, you said it exactly right and you don't even know it. I do want to level the middle east; starting with Syria, run down the bakka valley in Lebanon, next Iran, and then if necessary North Korea. If the highily enlightened leader of North Korea has a brain he should be ready to raise the white flag, but if not, no problem.
The fact that we can put a bomb into whatever corner of a building we want is a great option to have, but it doesn't take away from the fact that if you got the enemy cornered in a certain area, call in the B52's and level the area. I have zero problems with that. Simply solution to the problem.
Now before you start going off about the liberal tag line of innocent civilians, save your breath. At this point in time, there are no innocent civilians. All the innocent civilians used their brains and have left the area, all that's left are targets.
As far as you comment about going to war with half baked ideas, your wrong and I've got 3000 dead bodies and the ruble of the World Trade Center to back that up which you and others have forgotten about. If fact the day on Hannity and Combs they interviewed a college professor that has written a book basically stating that we over re-acted as a nation to the attacks on Pearl Harbor and 9/11. His main reason was that in the more global scheme of world terrorism these attacks are relativity small and as a more civilizied, highly enlighten society, these attacks shouldn't even concern us. Here's the link so you can listen to this over-educated idiot.
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?020107/020107_hc_mueller&Hannity_Colmes&Say%20What%3F%21&acc&Politics&-1&News&375&&&new
The only problem with this war is it's being fought with political correctness, and too much senitivity. The President is listening to too many people. I do subscribe to the idea of shoot them all and let God sort them out
Time to go, later days
Viper
-------------------------------------------------
No spin necessary , you are in need of professional help . Have a nice day go kill something .
Reddog
Bush has never listened to anyone unless
it served his purpose. He was going to attack Iraq because Saddam threatened daddy. If we don't get the idiot in chief out of office he'll have US in another war spening billions if not trillions on some other failed fit of paranoid, we gotta get them before they get US crap. This clown, born with a silver spoon is morally & environmentaly bankrupt. How can he represent the working class? He's never had to work for anything in his life.
The American people listen to what ever propaganda government hands out. Look at what has happened in Afghanistan since Bush forgot about the hard target, bin laden. He knew he could get Saddam & knew he couldn't get bin Laden. Bush's allies in Pakistan are buddies with bin Laden & Saddam wasn't, we attatcked Iraq & give Pakistan billions of $. Pakistan has WMD, the nukes that will be used against US with a military built on US tax $ & Iraq couldn't fire a scud across their nearest border with any expectation of hitting their intended target. How do you justify liberating the Iraqi people by killing the ones Saddam didn't kill.
The guy in Iraq who will benefit from the lost lives & $ is that nut who is going to run the country after we're gone. Except for a few thousand troops for show & billions of $ spent every year so we can drive around & drink beer in the US we won't have any reason to be there. We'll whine about the price of oil, fuel, & booze but won't cut back on the watse while sending Americans to die in the next war based on poor intelligence supporting the ignorance.
What's that other religious nut's name, Madhr? He is all about being an all important leader/God, just like Bush. That clown is letting it look like Bush's surge is working so we draw down & when the time is right he is going run the show. After we spent all our tax $, sacrificed all those patriotic Americans, & lost our butt in Afghanistan. Starting to look like the same loss Russia had to crawl away from except Bush is going to dress it up in a pretty red dress & call it success. We'll be just as broke as Russia if we don't reel the freak in.
Bush is going to spin it like victory & blame the Dems when it all comes back around. By the time Bush is out of office he'll claim victory because the violence had subsided making him look good & within a couple years it'll be Saddam all over except with a different nut running the show on our $ so we can still have oil. They will still be killing each other & in the end Bush will have gotten what he wanted, Saddam. One hell of price to pay when we could have manipulated Saddam into being an unwitting ally & spent all the money wasted in Iraq here in America on Homeland Defense, military build up, winning in Afghanistan, getting bin Laden, & lost a damn sight fewer of America's best.
As it is now, bin Laden will have Afghanistan back, the freak in Pakistan will become our next war, we'll be 5,000 patriotic dead Americans & trillions of dollars less all for one clown's need to be a self proclaimed war president dressed up in a flight suit on a carrier deck blowing smoke rings up the world's butt!
There's more to winning the war against terror than leveling the Middle East. Bush has done nothing but help terrorist with of that mentality. He would have nuked them if he could have gotten away with it. Before Bush is done he will have murdered more people than Saddam, with our money, in our name, & not accomplished squat. The American Vets will come home to poor if any medical support & end up homeless. The American people in support of Bush are just as bloodthirsty as Bush, Saddam & terrorist. That's the America of the 21st century with a batte cry of, "there's nothing you can doooo." as we go broke one at a time supporting the ignorance.
Our government is doing just as terrorist want, breaking US from within, using our money while sacrificing the Americans who pay for it while our misrepresentatives get rich. Damn tough for terrorist to lose.
So why are you letting it get you down?
Ignore it awhile. You've got things to actually accomplish before you die.
VIPER
Okay let's see what you've written and examine this:
"President Bush is in a position to know more than we do because he is the C in C"
-Why should he know more than us when it comes to making decisions about AMERICAN lives? Besides the fact that this war is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, we're being given misinformation or no information. That's not the way this country was set up to function.
"Your questions are not honest because they show a dis-trust of the leaders that "WE THE PEOPLE" elected to lead this country"
-It's our JOB as citizens to scrutinize every decision our leaders make. If we do not then we turn out like you - blind (Rush Limbaugh style) party loyalty and ignorant of FACT (fact like that this war is pointless and unconstitutional!).
"A more relavent question is, who's side is the media on? According to the reporting, the american media is on the side of the terrorists, prove me wrong"
-Funny - I'm not on the terrorists side, but I don't support the war either. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them "un-American." And remember, there are plenty of people who are REAL conservatives, who remember their values, like myself, who don't support the war. I don't think the media is unbias, but I think they're more realistic than your boy Rush Limbaugh.
1) We're in Iraq becuase of the money (not the oil).
2) Victory in Iraq just isn't possible for more reasons than the fact that peace will never actually reign there. There's been no formal declaration of war (just like Vietnam) and so there can be no "Victory".
3) Victory isn't possible with no declaration of war.
4) Terrorist organizations surrender? How ignorant is that? That's a nice wish... not in our lifetime.
5) I don't seem to remember Iraq ever invading our soil... I don't remember Sadaam Hussein sending troops over our borders. Please remind me of when that was... Oh and the terrorists... yeah - we leave our own front door unlocked and are expecting a war on their front lawn to actually work? Please - that's the worst strategy ever. We aren't keeping their troops busy, they are keeping our troops busy... and killing a lot of Americans in the process!
6) Yeah since Korea and Germany are still HUGE GLOBAL THREATS!!! You made a great point there!
7) Yeah - look at Isreal. You know as soon as we withdraw (if we ever do) it'll be just as war torn as it ever was before we entered. The whole "humanitarian war" claim that was made will be moot.
Please get some new material. You practically quoted that faux conservative, Rush Limbaugh.
...Vbron, 2020...
Vbron and the war on terror.
Vbron, 2020:
First, sorry that I have given you a timely answer to your questions, I've been away for a while.
Your questions prove your lack of reality concerning the war on terror and the nature of the enemy we face. You sound like your grasping at straws to find a revelant point in the discussion, but for now I'll play along.
You stated: Why should he (The President) know more than us when it comes to making decisions about AMERICAN lives? Besides the fact that this war is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, we're being given misinformation or no information. That's not the way this country was set up to function.
My answer: Your statement is nothing but more liberal retortic and prove your lack of understanding about the roles and responsibilities of our elected leaders. The President has to know more than we do because it's part of his sworn responsibility to protect and defend this country. Remember what all 43 Presidents have done once their elected to office. They place their hand on the Bible and swear before God and the American People to protect this country.
Now, please explain to me how the war is unconstitutional? I have yet to here a real, factually based answer to that bit of liberal retortic and misinformation. The President said loud and clear that we're going after the people that attacked our nation and the people who support them. Evidence clearly proved that Saddam was supporting Al Quada. I'm sure you've conviently forgotten that fact. I'm also sure that you've forgotten that we had a cease-fire agreement with Saddam's Iraq from the first gulf war that Saddam violated on a regular basis. I'm also sure that you've forgotten that a violation of the cease-fire agreement means that hostilities can be resumed at a time of our chosing, which we did. Before you start on the excuse of lack of finding WMD's, like most good liberals do, ask yourself the next logical question; where did they go? There's been eye witness accounts concerning where they went.
As a side note, didn't we also discover direct evidence that the French, Germans, and Russians were supplying Saddam with arms and weapons in direct violation of the UN oil for food agreement?
This is enough for now.
Vbron and the war on terror
You stated: -Funny - I'm not on the terrorists side, but I don't support the war either. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them "un-American." And remember, there are plenty of people who are REAL conservatives, who remember their values, like myself, who don't support the war. I don't think the media is unbias, but I think they're more realistic than your boy Rush Limbaugh.
My answer: Once again your proving just how silly and dangerous your "position" is. I've heard your position described as "I support the troops, but not the mission". Oh really!?
Then using that line of logic; you must support the Police, but you don't want them to enforce the law and protect lives, which is one of their missions.
You must support the Fire Department, but you don't want them to put out fires and protect property, which is one of their missions.
You must support the medical profession, but you don't want them to heal and help people, which is one of their missions.
As silly as this sounds, is as silly as you and other people sound with your anti-american liberal non-sense.
Later days,
Viper 210
Vbron...
I'ts nothing to do with this thread but I really don't like digging through 95 posts and how many pages much to find a NEW! next to a post, reply to it and drag back over that many pages because the Statesman can't bring me back. Sometimes I can't even find the post?
Webmaster, do you hear me? Please list the new posts when you click on 'X new' and give me better navigation, won't you? Most of the new posts lately go somewhere on pages 1 or 2 or about the middle of the list, by the way, meaning they bunch on older posts and detract from the end or newest.
Then navigation has to be fixed.
Victory- been there already
I think we have already achieved victory in Iraq. Saddam is out of power, lots of his bad guys are dead or in captivity. They have had elections. Women there can now vote!
Reflect back to WWII. Victory was Hitler being dead. Was Europe a utopia right after that? Of course not. It took millions of US dollars and it took time for things to settle. Why are we so impatient?
Japan was defeated with a big bomb. And the US took MAJOR efforts to bring Japan back and now look, 60 YEARS later we all love Japan (& Germany) and it is valuable to us. Perhaps in 60 years from now Iraq, will be a major trading partner, and will have civility and democracy.
The civil rights was a battle, right? People died for that cause. Did everything stop with 1964 legislation? No.... there are still people dying fighting for equal rights.
That's why we are there... there is HOPE it will be better. AND we are Americans. That's what we do. We help those who need help, we help the oppressed and we protect our national interests whenever possible.
Saddam violated the UN resolutions and he was a bad dude who wished harm upon the US (not to mention the harm he did on his own people). When a criminal ignores his probation do you look the other way, or do you send in the police? Yes, it's oil too. Everyone bitches about $3 gas. It's in our interest to have stability in that area for the cost of oil AND the effect oil has on our economy and the world.
Imagine if we hd left Iraq in 2003 and every trooper came back to the US. Then civil unrest started... if they were to have what they have now, and NO US troops were there, would we not go help the Iraqy people. Of course we would! We have a national interest in that region. And we have a little bit of interest helping other human beings.
Our tax dollars are drops in the bucket if this vision works out. Did your grandfather ask how much fighting the Japs would cost? Hitler? Fighting Hunger? Poverty? Does anyone say we are spending too much fighting crime? "you know I'm all for preventing drugs on our streets until a cops get killed." Oooh, geez, it's not worth it if someone has to die...
We ARE our greatest asset. What about those dying as cops? Teachers in a violent schools? Soldiers are warriors and that's what they do and they are willing to serve their country, because no one else has to come save us.
If someone is not willing to fight for their freedom and the freedom of others, they do not deserve freedom.
Yes, we have worn out our welcome. Certainly the planning and the execution of the full plan was done poorly. Just like in football, a good team can go with a good play but poor execution will lose the game. Does that mean you quit after the 1st quarter and give up?
Additionally that Nova show indicated how Iraq was planned as a stepping stone for Iran. If one accepts that, it's easy to see why the US command was not in a hurry to leave Iraq to their own destiny.
Damage control and better trade.
If I understand you correctly, we are currently in Iraq for two main reasons:
1) Damage control (damage we've been a big part of, mind you)
2) Better trade in the future
So when this war is written into the history books and a child asks, "For what cause did my father (or mother) die at such a young age?," their fastidious teacher will respond "because if had left, that country would have been in the same situation as it was when we got there. Additionally, look at how great of a trade partner they are! We've been outsourcing our jobs to them instead of India for years now!"
Monetary gain and global economy both seek to break down our sovereignty. We the people stand to gain little or nothing. Bush's cohorts in the banking business stand to gain much. They've got a national bank established backed by American dollars there. Rebuilding takes a lot of money and they now have a privately owned national bank (just like we do here) to loan them that cash.
This propaganda has been working, and we've been made a passive people. I can't fathom how the loss of ONE American life justifies any trade relation or monetary gain. How do you put a price on a life? Tell me that you HONESTLY believe that when and if we ever withdraw troops from that area that it will thrive.
This is a stepping stone to the break down of our sovereignty and the rise in power of the New World Order.
...Vbron...
I miss the old daze...
When we were in it for God, country and Asian drugs.
It's history
In Reply.
No, not exactly.
-The place is a mess and needs our help. Is that "damage control"??? No.
-Iraq is a major key to the Middle East. The Middle East affects our economy. And our GIANT economy is in our national interest. YOUR job, your lifestyle, your commute from Canyon County to Ada county is all dependent on barrels of oil.
Damage control???
Why are we in Korea? 50 some years later we have men and women serving in Korea. The list goes on and on. Why are we there? Or there? Or why are we NOT there? I don't see Idaho Peace Coalition wackos protesting to bring our troops home from Korea. Our troops are througout the world protecting our interests and sometimes that means fixing problems we created. The whole ISRAEL/Middle East in many ways is our doing... Does Lebonon and the US Marine barracks bring any thoughts?
Why have we spent billions of dollars in Korea? You all do realize NKorea STILL wants to take back SKorea, right? If there wasn't a DMZ today, your cell phone would be made somewhere other than Korea. Wanna help Micron? Advodate a pull-out of Korea and Micron will be making lot of profits and hiring all those whiners back.
I don't recall anyone asking Clinton why American soldiers DIED in SOMALIA. They were on peace keeping efforts, right? Well that's pretty much what we're doing in Iraq or trying to do. Our mindset is, a few are okay, but a bunch is not. It was nothing to do with the principle of the matter.
***************
It's not simply "better trade".
It's not "trade relations" or "monetary gain". It's recession, depression, economic collapse, family budgets, interest rates (homes), etc. Let's go into our imaginary minds and picture a future Iran launching a warhead onto Israel (you can pick the city, Jerusalem, Haifa, Bethleham, whichever). What will that mean to YOU?
What would our (world) economy be like if the Persian gulf shut down tomorrow?
Our economy is subsidized by the military protection of the shipping lanes in the Gulf. People die in that effort too... for example, the USS Cole (Oct.2000), 17 dead sailors and the rest of their shipmates were there protecting YOUR cheap gas prices so you don't complain too much about your freedom to pump and drive; and so you can heat your home inexpensively; and to keep the costs of production down.
What would happen if China took Taiwan back? Our military (w/ help of Japan) has prevented that from happening. Do you think that doesn't cost any money? You can call that "better trade" if you want, but I think it's something much bigger.
The majority of Americans are all about the 'flavor of the day'. I'm sure there is nothing happening in Iraq that is not a repeat of history. We are simply short-sighted and only think about today. To one degree or another, less or more, it's just a repeat of what we've been doing for a LONG time all throughout world. ANd what we will continue to do in the future. Why? Well I think its mostly about YOUR pocket book or someones' religion. RE: the debates, I heard about H. Clinton voting in Congress to give the Pres. the authority to take military action against Iran if necessary. WHAT? Despite what we learn from the pst, we continue to make the same mistakes.
************
How do you put a price on life?
Well, how do you put a price on freedom? Instead of a price, how about which one is MORE valuable??? I'll vote freedom is more valuable than 'life'. "Give me liberty, or give me death".
**************
Why did my father die at such a young age (in that war)?
Perhaps you could respond for us all with the long list of places and times throughout history where that question is applicable?
I see your point
You've made some really good points.
The reason I supported the Iraq war in the beginning - despite the fact that we went in there on faulty (or fabricated) evidence - was that we were "paving the way for freedom."
You ask - what is the price of freedom? I agree that TRUE freedom is worth any price. But that freedom must be purchased by the people who are going to receive it. Our county was made great because people offered PERSONAL sacrifices to make it that way. We are still in countries like Korea because WE offered a sacrifice to make it that way. We continue to do so. We are playing big brother to countries that should have made the effort and sacrifice themselves. They are like teenagers who have been given an expensive car for their 16th birthday. They LOVE the gift, but do not fully understand or appreciate it. Until they win the victory for themselves and by themselves, they will never fully appreciate it. That is why I submit to you that this war has not and cannot be won. "Give me liberty, or give me death" applied to us then. "Give them liberty, and give me death" applies to us now.
I can't justify American lives simply to promote our way of living. It seems to me like we're just out to tell others how to run their countries, how to live. I can't justify American lives simply to preserve our current way of life (i.e. dependance on foreign oil). I can't justify American lives to purchase the freedom of people who have largely not accepted the gift.
...Vbron...
Changes
And I was against the invasion when it started. But now I believe it was the right thing to do and WMD has nothing to do with it. Granted still bad execution and bad management of the aftermath = Rumsfeld and Cheney (Bush is too dumb to be responsible for anything).
***********
"They LOVE the gift, but do not fully understand or appreciate it."
Yes, and that can also be applied to the MILLIONS of American who do nothing to protect their own freedoms or excercise it. No voting, no military service, no community service, no JobCorp, no community service, no church service.... etc. Lots of us love the gifts but are not willing to fight for them.
So does that mean the whole military should boycott because there are soo many people who are not willing to help them? I'm not talking about yellow ribbons and saying "We Support our troops"-- I'm talking about picking up a rifle and relieving a soldier on watch; sharing the risk he is taking; sharing the effort so he is not deployed for so long.
I love my gifts and I am willing to SHARE them and fight for others who want the same.
Foreign Policy-- US Empire--
Your opinions are familiar, with a very British attitude, history has called it colonialism. We have inheited the British attitude, have continued on with our Empire, we'll be lucky if it lasts as long. "Our way of Life" what else matters!
God Save the Queen!
Yup.
And there was ALSO this global group called "The United Nations"-- maybe you've heard about them???
They had 'an opinion' about Iraq too. And they consensus opinions called "Resolutions" which were guidelines for Iraq to follow and play nicely with other countries. It was kinda like 'most' of the world telling Iraq to stay within their border and not invade countries like Kuwait, not to release poisonouse gas on dissenting people, not to build nuclear bombs to detonate against Israel, you know.... things like that. AND they were WAY before the Powell speach with bad intelligence information.
BUT Saddam kinda said, "like,,, screw you world!!! I don't have to follow your rules cuz you're all pussie-foots and I don't have to worry. I have one of the 3rd largest army (use to be) and I can do what I want. And I'll just delay you all until I get my stuff over to my friends in Syria (or wherever). Sanctions my butt. I don't need no stinkin sanctions".
So now we have the result of 'imperialism' gone awry.
Imperialism
Yap ---------- You gettem' Rambo
Never mind the Queen...
here's the Sex Pistols.
Dear Jesus:
Please, dear Mr. Jesus, who would YOU bomb? Hom many innocent Iraqi men, women and children do YOU think is a fair price for protecting the petroleum interests of America? How many insurgents would YOU waterboard to get "intelligence"? How many people would YOU toss into Guantanamo and deny the right to legal redress?
Oh, and one more thing, Mr. Jesus. When George Bush tells us that God told him to be President, and to start a war with another country, was he talking about Your Dad, or one of those other gods?
Killing of people
You talk about our people here in the USA our military men dieing.
Well what if you were born there? It could be your whole family even you with them that gets poisoned. We needed to go there. For what ever reasons we were told. We are there and we need to finish the job. Every one that signs up to be in the military knows or should know what they are doing before they enlist. Its not all about only getting a free education. I'm so tired about hearing about our men dieing, yes it is very bad for them and their families but they did sign up. My whole family through out history was in the military.My father fought two wars World War 2 and Korea. He never said one time he regrets it. In memory of USS MORRISON DD560 went down and the only survivors went back and fought still more to keep protecting us. when you cut down our President you cut down our military men to.
Sayeth Metallica,
Kill 'em all!
Jesus Built My Hot Rod!
I know I am truly blessed, even as the tires hit the guardrail and I roll in flames.
What are all the people in support of war doing here?
Editorial by Arthur Kilton 12-3-07 Elected democrats are undermining America. If people like Arthur are all about the war in Iraq why isn't he in Iraq doing something about it rather than here, bad mouthing people who knew Iraq was never a threat to US? Saddam was a lot like BSali, full of BS. The Gulf War proved Saddam's military was a joke & W's daddy didn't finish the job because he knew more than junior. The old man avoided the mess junior got US into for a reason, so far it's only a $600 billion reason but it'll cost trillions before W's accomplished total failure.
Next time we elect a President, don't send a boy. Junior was born with a silver spoon, never had to work a day in his life, finish the military, school, or hold a job. How could he represent the working class, average taxpayers, like the ones fighting for their country while the Arthurs support the lies?
The army needs a few good men Arthur, have at it. I've heard people say our government has worked for two hundred years. If that is the case why are We the People in debt to the tune sof $9 trillion, $30K each? Congress is coming back to work, I imagine they'll have it straightened out by the end of the week. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, FEMA, USDA, FDA, Postal Service, Homeland Security, & all those little things they forget about while on vacation after getting nothing done for months, no worries. Was it 103 days they worked in 2006?
Would any of the corporations buying our representation continue on this path if their CEO or Board of directors had those corporations in that kind of hole? If they show a loss, {on purpose} they get tax cuts. What do we get? Pay the taxes they evade. Seems odd the Idaho Tax Commission & IRS nickle & dime individuals while campaign contributors evade billions through our representation/lawbreakers. I don't know why the people would think it's ok for Craig to use campaign contributions for his legal fees & not think the same $ corporations give away in return for tax cuts wouldn't do just as much good for education. I guess your property taxes aren't high enough, YET!
Democats, republicans, they're all small change in corporate unAmerica's pocket at taxpayer expense! Tax campaign contributions, cut their pay, end politicians paid health care & retirement. Can't get Americans to do jobs at $7 an hour, jobs that paid a living wage in the seventies, $12 an hour, so they broke unions & brought in illegal immigrants as a favor to campaign contibutors. Illegal immigration never hurt America did it? Can't swing a dead cat without hitting a meth freak. Didn't screw up the cost of health care either I suppose.
According to the 14% approval rating Congress & 25% Bush is getting, seems like we can't get anybody to do the jobs we pay them for so maybe it's time to be the boss, shareholders in the largest corporation in the world, America.
If the Arthurs of this country were in touch with reality, well I guess they'll never hear that popping sound, the sound of their head coming out.
That would be a start, too bad all the Arthurs with their head in their butt in the air like a target, can't see what's going on. www.nextrevolution.net
No money has Artie...
to keep from being burnt toast.
Probably smart.
I have enough problems typing to go to 45 million websites that won't interest me at all, but then again hold yer tongue you argue enough with me.
our Congress is a mess
They are not doing their jobs. This year our taxes are going to be late because they keep running their mouths off about issues that are garbage. Oh yea I can not forget if they get their way all our taxes are going up $2000.00 next year. Alot of people rely on their returns and they might owe next year thanks to our great congress and DEMS. Get a clue please.
You don't know what you're talking about
A $2000 increase? What rag did you get that from? You can look at the 2007 tax tables on line. There have been some minor changes, such as increase to the individual standard deduction, exemptions have increased, and some other minor changes, but the only real change is the patch on the AMT. If you are talking about a small business, yes they have increased a little, but I doubt it is $2000 worth. (Of course that would be relative to the entire gross income) Are you trying to create unnecessary hysteria?
Sometimes the stoopid gets so thick
you could slice it with a dull axe.
I just love it when people complain about the Dems and taxes.
Surely they prefer that the borrow and spend Reps just keep on a borrowin' and a spendin' while the richest Americans have their taxes cut.
Guess what? China now owns us. The day they call in their markers is the day our country's financial infrastrucure collapses. How do you like knowing our way of life depends on the whims of a communist nation?
China
Hmm. Well lets see who let China in to start buying our land and sell their junk to us and they own alot of our debt? Give ya a big guess. Its not all the republicans fault. It goes back alot of years. And the rich is who pays for medium and poor class peoples work pay. If they tighten down then who hurts for it? (US). And the rich do pay alot on their taxes.
Terigro
What do you mean it's not the Republican's fault? That's why I left the Republican party! We were spending like irresponsible teenagers with a credit card! We spent money we never had, borrowed from our future generations, and totally screwed the economy in a lot of ways. If you believe all the Rush Limbaugh/Hannity bull crap, you've got your head in the sand.
I agree that the rich are over taxed. Not that the middle/lower income people should pay more, but the wealthy should keep more of their wealth. Tax cuts at the current rate of Federal spending is impossible. Republicans are making this problem worse!
The Democrats at least have the sense to cut spending before they cut taxes. Bush buys your vote by putting a little money back in your pockets... then he spends 100 times as much and asks you, your children, and likely your children's children to pay for it! Who is footing the cost of the war? Who is paying the price of freedom? We pay a little, but our children will be paying a lot. Don't kid yourself into thinking that all is well in this country. If you aren't absolutely pissed off with the way it's been run, then you aren't paying attention.
That said, I don't support any Dems for the upcoming election. I don't trust them any more than I trust that Rush Limbaugh isn't just a talking head and a propagandist.
We need to get out of Iraq, regain control of spending, and secure our own borders!
...Vbron, 2020...
Nah!
We need aliens more than they need us LOLOL
RE: Sometimes the stoopid gets so thick
He's got a point; Chinese banks own all the coin on paper money.
But, this isn't a political issue. Investors on both sides have found it much cheaper to invest their money with chinese banks, because the rates there are much lower then in the United States.
Anybody notice how in 2000 The Pound was almost on par with the dollar and now, even with a wakening pound, it is worth twice as much as the Dollar?
Our economy will tank in the future, and no, it really has nothing to do with this war. America was designed by Alexander Hamilton to be in perpetual debt, which we are in. The Economic fallout will occur from the Chinese banks outside the united states, which has nothing to do with our national debt.
Conflicting Views
I'm in a peculiar position in my view of the war; I'm not really sure what we should do to be completely honest. I think the war has it's right and wrong itnentions, right being the export of democracy and wrong being the prospect of the US simply trying to gain control of Iraqi oil Fields. I think Bush has handled this was to the best of HIS ability. By that I mean what he has control of, he has done well. You can't tell me he is the only one with power on how this war goes; Several parties are involved, like the UN, Haliburton and Blackwater. He gets alot of crap simply because he is president, and the fact that nobody likes war, no matter how badly it is or isnt needed.
So, is victory possible? At some point, no time in the near future though. There will always be insurgents, always soldiers willing to fight them. I don't think we should stay the current course, but I don't think a complete pullout is smart either. We are in a position in which either way we lose something, and we will lose less if we keep trrops here to stabalize the region then we will just completely pulling out; 1st off the media fallout will be tremendous. 2nd, our country may not be able to unite for a war like this again in the future, which could be a problem if a war is truly needed.
I think the war's image has been completely distorted by the media. What more, we, the populous, aren't informed of the more indepth details. Maybe there really is a good purpose. Or maybe we are just doing this for the oil benefit. Either way, we wont have an answer in the near future, and I predict we may never have one at all.
So am I Pro-war? Yes. Am I for Staying the course? No. As much as it pains me to see our boys out there fighting everyday, I think its imperative that we dont pullout, even a phased pullout like several democrats have suggested, mostly due to the fallout that will occur after it is all over.
terigro
How old were you when Nixon went to China ? Type Nixon China in your search engine and learn something .
Bush bought your vote for around a $300 tax cut --------- I hope you got your moneys worth .
Well the bill is about to come due , and you still think there is a free lunch -- THERE ISN'T !
Stop blaming all your money problems on the Democrats -- they didn't run up the bill -- you did .
Reddog
RE: terigro
I didn't blame money problems on democrats; I blamed it on poor investment choices
And Explain to me how Bush bought my vote for a $300 tax cut?
sam453
You may have to cut and paste :
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/taxes/a/bushtaxcuts.htm
As I recall I got around $300 ---- how much of a bribe did you get ?
Reddog
I got a measly $10 COLA
Bought gas and Cheetos and a 44 oz at Jackson's. YAY
Looks like Bush is going to pay
another $300, $600, $1,200 or whatever to each America so as to bail himself out before we're rid of him. Too little, too late? He'll be gone & we'll have spent another $150 billion, add to on to $9 trillion, & the next war president will be voted in according to campaign contributions.
If our representatives or just one presidential candidate were half as interested in US as they are in how much $ they can put together for their campaigns We the People might get some representation instead of paying all the taxes evaded by corporate unAmerica.
No matter what shape America is in when the next president takes office Bush will be all about his success. Baghdad, three fourths of which is now under control might be completely under control but at what cost? The US economy? Was it worth it? Seems funny Bush will go out the same way he came in, buying the American people with beads & trinkets just like the colonist did the Native Americans. We'll end up just like the Native Americans did, on the res. in a trailer with no wheels cause we sold them for booze.
Are we going the same way Russia went after they crawled home from Afghanistan? Broke!
Weren't we happy...
they left? Now we can build it up too being sorry for their poverty, I guess.
Well, I guess that 20+ years gives us time to assess these feelings.
reddog181
I never denied a tax cut
I asked how he bought my vote with it- it was enacted 2 years after he gained office
sam453
As I recall he ran on it in his first election ---------- Want a tax cut ? Vote for me .
It is still going on in the Pube party -- simple bribery and nothing about paying the massive bills .
Reddog
sam453 -- Tax cut bribe
Try this link :
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/30/eveningnews/main639550.shtml
Reddog
Sorry
The doctor told me to cut down on hyperlinks.
foreignoregonian
"The doctor told me" ------------- I don't blame you , it makes me a little sick to .
Reddog