Crapo, Risch vote against U.N. disabilities treaty

Idaho Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch joined 36 Republican colleagues in blocking a United Nations treaty addressing the rights of the disabled.

The treaty — known as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities — received a 61-38 vote, falling short of the two-thirds majority required to pass a treaty.

Details about the vote — and the treaty — from Jim Abrams of the Associated Press:

The vote took place in an unusually solemn atmosphere, with senators sitting at their desks rather than milling around the podium. Former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, looking frail and in a wheelchair, was in the chamber to support the treaty.

The treaty, already signed by 155 nations and ratified by 126 countries, including Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia, states that nations should strive to assure that the disabled enjoy the same rights and fundamental freedoms as their fellow citizens. Republicans objected to taking up a treaty during the lame-duck session of the Congress and warned that the treaty could pose a threat to U.S. national sovereignty.

Here's a statement from Crapo:

"Although current U.S. disability law is sufficient for implementation of and compliance with the treaty, it is unclear how the treaty would limit or impact the ability to change or modify existing U.S. disability law. There has been considerable concern that the CRPD promotes the idea that governments, not parents, have the ultimate voice in the decisions concerning their children. U.S. membership in the CRPD would not advance the cause of persons with disabilities living in the U.S. since the U.S. already has comprehensive statutory, regulatory, and enforcement mechanisms regarding disability rights."

And here's a statement from Risch:

"The U.S. has the most comprehensive and protective laws in the world benefiting disabled people. Other countries would do well to emulate us. I am absolutely opposed to turning over standards in this field, or for that matter any field, to other countries and non-Americans and agreeing to those standards without learning what they are in advance. In addition, I do not believe that this is a proper role of the United Nations. I have been outspoken and critical of the ballooning reach of the United Nations into every aspect of our lives. At the end of the day, this is a matter of national sovereignty for the United States and every other country in the world. We have sufficient problems right here in America to deal with without attempting to meddle in every aspect of the laws of other countries."

Get Twitter updates on my blog and column and Statesman editorials. Become a follower. You can also get updates on Facebook's Idaho Statesman Opinion Page.

If you really cared Kevin

You would post the UN Treaty side by side with the Americans with Disabilities Act so that your readers could judge for themselves rather than post two meaningless paragraphs from an AP "journalist". Look up the meaning of the word "details" as you have chosen to use that word above for some reason when none are provided. What does the treaty provide for that the ADA does not? What about parental rights in the UN treaty as opposed to the ADA with regards to disabled children, for instance?

Have you considered the possibility that your pseudo idealism is "shading" your journalistic integrity and objectivity?


...if you read the actual terms of the treaty, we don't provide a lot of this stuff to the fully functional here in the US, let alone the disabled. Certainly the Republicans are against this en masse because to comply with it would cost them something.


elude you. Examples are beyond your ability. Perhaps you would be happier living in a country that has adopted the UN treaty and it's platitudes rather than in the US where the ADA carries the force of law.

Speaking of the United Nations, KR.....

Wasn't the United Nations overseeing our general election last month? Have they filed a report yet? It would be informative to know how we did when it comes to meeting the U.N.'s elctions standards.

The United Nations, already out of control. It cost's tax payers one million dollars apiece to be a member of the United Nations. At a time when the U.S.A. is sliding over the financial cliff, the U.N. should be excluded from future funding. China and Russia always cancels the U.S.A. vote and citizens of America are scrutinized closer than most are aware of. WE spend more on foreign policy than taking care of our own domestic policies which definitely include our very sad American's With Disabilities Act.