Zoo Boise monkey killing exposes weakness in Idaho animal cruelty law

A draft of our Wednesday editorial.

It isn’t the early morning break-in at Zoo Boise that outraged a community and drew national attention.

It’s what happened after the break-in. When authorities searched the zoo for the intruders, they heard groaning — but could not tell if they were hearing the sound of a human or an animal. Outside a primate cage, they found a 35-pound Patas monkey that had suffered blows to the head and neck. The monkey died from the beating.

But on Monday, when 22-year-old Michael Watkins of Weiser was arrested in connection with the killing, animal cruelty was not among the charges. Watkins instead faces two felony charges of burglary and grand theft.

The burglary charge centers on the 4:30 a.m. break-in. The second charge addresses the attack itself: taking or deliberately killing “livestock or any other animal exceeding $150 in value” falls under Idaho’s definition of grand theft.

Why no animal cruelty charge?

Because Idaho’s recently rewritten animal cruelty law is so embarrassingly weak that it borders on useless. Animal cruelty is a misdemeanor, unless an offender violates the law three times within 15 years. Only then can felony penalties kick in.

This in-name-only felony animal cruelty law passed the 2012 Legislature with overwhelming bipartisan support. The law accomplished just one real and cynical purpose: It circumvented a tougher animal cruelty voter initiative before it could even qualify for the ballot.

The Zoo Boise break-in resulted in senseless violence — a crime that resonates in the community because it is bizarre, and because of its brutality. If ever a crime fell under the definition of animal cruelty, this would be it. But when Boise police had to decide on charges, they had at their disposal an animal cruelty law that did them no good.

“We felt the more serious (grand theft) charge would be more applicable in this case,” said Boise police Detective Wade Spain, the acting supervisor for the unit that investigated the monkey killing.

Our quarrel here is with the Legislature. Boise police made the best call it could: pursuing this case as a felony, albeit as a property crime. In so doing, the police exposed the state’s animal cruelty law for what it is: a weak piece of political damage control.

Much remains unknown about this case: the circumstances and the intent. At this point, Watkins is only accused of a crime. But a wanton, premeditated attack on a zoo animal would well warrant a prison sentence and the label of a convicted felon. Punishment should always fit the crime. Idaho’s animal cruelty law is not equal to the task.

animal cruelty

You are ASSUMING he went in there to kill the animal. The next question is, if someone should go to prison for killing an animal. Do you put animals on the same level as human beings? Are animals property? Where do you draw the line? Is hunting animals cruel? There are people who kill other people and don't go to prison, so where do we put our resources?


Good points, especially about the intent. I reworked the final paragraph to reflect the fact that the case is still sketchy.

Kevin Richert
editorial page editor

Only with KR and the Statesman does....

the killing of a monkey get more editorial comment and above-the-fold coverage than the killing of a U.S. Ambassador and 4 other Americans in and around a U.S. Consulate. Pathetic.

And your solution is:


Inform the leaders at the Statesman that....

as a subscriber I am somewhat more interested in a terrorist attack on a U.S. Consulate that results in the murder of 4 Americans than I am about Idaho's animal cruelty law.

So go fight those guys! Monkeys are cooler alive!


Nothing happened and what if it did?

It would make no difference

Tetpilot, it would make no difference what the Statesman publishes, you continue your tirade without merit or veracity.

You are one unhappy brain washed member of the Utah cult. Go fly your cargo plane since you are unable to converse with intelligence.