Melaleuca CEO Frank Vandersloot's independent expenditures and contributions to Yes for Idaho Education and the Idaho Federation of Republican Women have now topped $1 million in the contest over Propositions 1, 2 and 3.
After two teachers unions, the Idaho Education Association ($280,000) and National Education Association ($1.06 million) reported spending through Sept. 30, VanderSloot vowed to do what he could to counter.
IEA's spending has reached about $385,000, with a report covering the period Oct. 1 to Oct. 21 due today. IEA on Monday added a $96,000 contribution to Idaho Republicans for Our Schools, which is chaired by IEA Vice President Rick Jones, a Republican. NEA spending has reached at least $1.8 million.
VanderSloot said in a three-page news release Tuesday afternoon that his contributions have topped $1 million, saying the opposition campaign has been dishonest.
Campaign finance reports are posted on Idaho Secretary of State Ben Ysursa's website. To get the full scale of spending in the race, check three places: party committees, measure and miscellaneous committees and independent expenditures and electioneering communications. VanderSloot has made contributions from Melaleuca and Natural Guardian, a company he owns.
VanderSloot's news release follows:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Melaleuca Donates over $1 Million to Support Idaho’s Education Reform Laws,
Helps Level the Playing Field Against The Union
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho – Oct. 30, 2012 – Melaleuca has now contributed over $1 million to support the Students Come First education reform laws that will be on the November 6 ballot as Propositions 1, 2, and 3. Melaleuca’s donations have been used to broadcast television and radio spots and publish full-page newspaper advertisements across the state of Idaho.
Melaleuca significantly increased its financial involvement in the campaign a few weeks ago after learning that the National Education Association (NEA) union had bombarded Idaho airwaves by spending more than $1 million with the Vote No on Propositions 1,2,3 campaign through September. Discloser reports reveal the NEA and Idaho Education Association have funded virtually all of the Vote No campaign, which is now estimated to have surpassed $2 million with one week left to go.
“The national teachers Union has launched perhaps the most dishonest campaign in Idaho history,” said Melaleuca CEO Frank VanderSloot. “We could not just stand by and let the NEA out of Washington, D.C. take over Idaho schools. I think to just look the other way would be morally wrong.” VanderSloot added, “They have spent millions paying for untruthful ads suggesting Props 1, 2, and 3 take away local control, are unfunded mandates, and will increase taxes, while the opposite is true. The propositions will actually put local school boards in control with more input from parents. And they will not cause any new taxes.
“But now the unions have stooped to new lows with an ad that claims to be paid by Idaho Republicans for our schools Pac. This group has nothing to do with the Republican Party. It is run by the vice president of the Idaho teachers union.
“The political funding from the NEA has already turned this into perhaps the most expensive campaign waged in Idaho history. The Union knows it will take a lot of money and a barrage of misinformation to turn voters against the school reform laws.”
VanderSloot explains his company’s involvement with education reform
“I was still in high school when Kitty Genovese was murdered in front of her New York City apartment in 1964. But the story of her death had a serious impact on me. Thirty-seven people had heard her cries for help while her attacker stabbed her dozens of times over a half-hour period. But not a single person came to her aid. The story became national news. The entire nation was in disbelief. Everyone was asking why no one stepped forward to help or even call the police. When the bystanders were interviewed, they had all kinds of excuses. “I thought someone else would do it.” “I didn’t know she was hurt that bad.” “I did not want to risk becoming involved.”
“Sandpoint, Idaho, where I grew up, is a long way from New York City. But Kitty Genovese’s story caused me to make some serious promises to myself as a young man. I did not ever want to be found guilty of what those New York City bystanders were guilty of. I vowed that if I were ever in a situation where someone was being hurt or treated unfairly, I would not be counted as a bystander. I had no idea how that promise would impact the rest of my life. Throughout the years, I’ve gotten into a lot of trouble trying to stay true to that commitment.
“Although my family lived far below the poverty line while I was growing up, my life has now been blessed with resources far beyond what I deserve. I often see situations where I can help. I’m especially drawn to situations where things are being done unfairly to someone else or where someone has an unfair advantage. If a mother doesn’t have the funds to file for divorce in an abusive situation, we will get involved. If someone is being attacked unfairly by the press, we will get involved. If someone with deep pockets is trying to buy an election, we will try to level the playing field.
“There is a lot of unfairness in the world. I certainly don’t believe that it is fair that my family has prospered so greatly while others are struggling. I have lived about two-thirds of my life struggling financially and about one-third of my life in prosperity. I prefer prosperity, but I believe a huge responsibility rests on those who have resources to use those resources fairly and responsibly to the benefit of society as a whole.
“It is no secret that the stranglehold the unions have had on our education system has done American schools a lot of damage. I was thrilled to learn two years ago that Governor Butch Otter and the Idaho Legislature had taken on the challenge of education reform in Idaho. Although the legislation they created is not perfect, it’s really good. Anyone who cares about children will be in favor of Propositions 1, 2 and 3. The new laws take control of our schools away from unions and place it in the hands of local school boards and parents. But, as expected, the NEA (the Washington, D.C. national teachers union) has decided to spend millions of dollars trying to undo the good work of Governor Otter and the Idaho Legislature. Neither the state of Idaho nor the school boards have any funds to fight the union. Local school boards against the deep pockets of the NEA is an unfair fight. That is why Melaleuca has decided to try to level the playing field. We don’t have nearly enough funds to match the national unions. But we can’t stand idly by.
“Many wanted to donate anonymously, but their funds have been tied up because of legal maneuverings. Their desire to stay anonymous is understandable. Many individuals and companies are afraid to fight the union, after all, and this has been a very vicious campaign. The unions have made personal threats to individuals and companies who support the legislation. They threatened our state senators and state representatives with their careers if they voted in favor of the legislation. Superintendent Tom Luna was threatened. His car was vandalized, his tires were slashed and his mother was accosted while she was at home. When I went to testify at the Senate hearings, union president Sheri Wood accosted me and threatened to call for a boycott on Melaleuca. Because of the personal risk that individuals or companies take when they speak out against the union, I don’t believe we should judge them for asking that their donations in support of Propositions 1, 2 and 3 not be disclosed. But someone had to take a stand to try to get accurate information out about the Propositions. Because the Propositions are so important to our children’s future, Melaleuca decided not to be a bystander.
“I have a great deal of respect for Idaho teachers. I had some wonderful teachers in my youth. Great teachers change lives! Some teachers have said that when people criticize the union, the union is really the teachers. I don’t believe that. The teachers I know are not dishonest. The teachers I know would never misrepresent the truth to the degree that the union ads do about the Propositions. The teachers I know would not be trying to misinform the public. Unfortunately, the teachers have been misinformed by their own union. Make no mistake. The teachers are not the union. In some ways, the teachers are victims of the union.
“We hope that people will not believe the union rhetoric about the Propositions. Neither should they take our word for what the Propositions do. People should study the Propositions for themselves. And when they do, we believe that anyone who cares about kids and cares about education will vote in favor of the Propositions. Propositions 1 and 2 are by far the most important. Proposition 1 has been endorsed by the Idaho School Boards Association. That’s because school boards simply cannot do their job without Proposition 1. Please study the Propositions in detail and vote as an educated voter.”
– Frank L. VanderSloot
You can follow Idaho Statesman Politics on Twitter.