Idaho politics: Simpson, Labrador oppose budget stopgap (UPDATED, 9:20 a.m.)

UPDATED, 9:20 a.m., with statement from Rep. Raul Labrador.

The House voted overwhelmingly on a far-reaching "continuing resolution" to keep federal budgets afloat into March — and Idaho's two representatives voted no.

Rep. Mike Simpson, Idaho's lone Appropriations Committee member, went out of his way to rip the deal.

“Let me be clear, shutting down the government is not an option,” Simpson said in a news release Thursday. “But making it a regular practice to fund government operations through continuing resolutions is also an abdication of Congress’ oversight responsibilities. I’m frustrated that Congress has become satisfied with simply kicking the can down the road. We have run out of road. It’s time to stop hiding our heads in the sand and start addressing the challenges facing our country.”

1st District Rep. Raul Labrador also voted against the stopgap. Here's his statement: "I voted against the CR because it didn't achieve realistic savings. The numbers in the CR were excessive. Congress should know better, American taxpayers deserve better."

The resolution passed, 329-91. Here, from the Washington Post, is a useful breakdown of who voted no, and why.

Here is the Simpson news release:

Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson today opposed an effort by Congress to put off finalizing a federal budget for six months. Rather than completing work on next year’s budget before the current fiscal year ends on September 30, the House passed H.J.Res. 117, a continuing resolution which extends discretionary spending until the election is over and a new Congress is in place. Simpson, who chairs the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, voted against the CR, expressing his continued frustration at Congress’s inability to complete its work.

“In spite of the fact that September 30 comes at the same time each year, Congress continually fails to fulfill its constitutional responsibility to fund government operations through the regular process,” said Simpson. “When we fail to pass annual appropriations bills, we fail to look critically at how agencies spend taxpayer dollars and lose opportunities to make government work better. It is time that we take the long-term CR off the table as a viable alternative to meeting our constitutional obligation.”

The continuing resolution funds discretionary government programs at current levels through March 27, 2013, with a slight across-the-board increase to meet the overall spending level previously agreed to in the Budget Control Act. The House Appropriations Committee has passed all but one FY13 appropriations bill in committee, and seven bills have passed on the House floor.

“Let me be clear, shutting down the government is not an option,” said Simpson. “But making it a regular practice to fund government operations through continuing resolutions is also an abdication of Congress’s oversight responsibilities. I’m frustrated that Congress has become satisfied with simply kicking the can down the road. We have run out of road. It’s time to stop hiding our heads in the sand and start addressing the challenges facing our country.”

In spite of Simpson’s opposition, H.J.Res 117 passed the House by a vote of 329-91. The measure is expected to be taken up by the Senate in the coming days.

Get Twitter updates on my blog and column and Statesman editorials. Become a follower. You can also get updates on Facebook's Idaho Statesman Opinion Page.

I agree that the Congress

I agree that the Congress should do it's job of completing a budget. If they can't this legislation is needed.

TOTALLY AGREE! It has become

TOTALLY AGREE! It has become epidemic in almost every aspect of government. Enough already.

Maybe with a few less vacations

and a lot more respect for our President, these guys would get something done. Not sure what we're paying them for!