Anti-discrimination law in Idaho: Leadership begins locally

Here is a sneak preview of a draft of our Wednesday editorial:

At the Statehouse, elected officials treat advocates for gays and lesbians as a noisy annoyance, a group to be ignored and dismissed as hastily as possible.

At Sandpoint, elected officials treat these advocates with respect and dignity. Or, in other words, like constituents. Imagine that.

Sandpoint is the first Idaho city to pass an ordinance banning workplace or housing discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. And, we hope, not the last. Since the Idaho Legislature seems unwilling to take a stand for equality, then it’s up to city councils to show the compassion and courage that appears to be lacking at the state level.

As the Spokane Spokesman-Review’s Betsy Russell reports, Pocatello is writing a proposed ordinance, and Boise is looking into the issue. Mayor Dave Bieter has asked the city attorney’s office to do some research.

That’s a good first step — and it gives the issue of workplace and housing discrimination far more thoughtful consideration than it has received at the Statehouse.

Earlier this year, just as Sandpoint’s ordinance was going into effect, supporters of anti-discrimination legislation were making a concerted push to lobby lawmakers. The rallying point for the “Add the Words” campaign was simple and direct: expand the existing state anti-discrimination law to cover sexual orientation and gender identity.

But the message was rejected, in about as callous a manner as possible. With nearly 300 people on hand, and within a matter of minutes, the Senate State Affairs Committee voted along party lines to reject the proposal. Republicans on the committee didn’t give the issue a public hearing, and refused to even allow a bill to be “printed,” or formally introduced.

While disrespecting the supporters of this legislation, these senators also have dismissed an idea whose time has come.
Similar anti-discrimination policies are common in the Idaho workplace, at companies such as Micron Technology, Albertsons and Hewlett-Packard. While Boise considers a citywide anti-discrimination ordinance, its internal policies prohibit this discrimination with City Hall; Caldwell has a similar workplace policy.

This is the trend.

The Idaho Legislature is wrongly and stubbornly resisting it.

So, perhaps, Idaho needs more Sandpoints. More communities where elected officials have the guts to stand up for their own, and do the right thing. And if, in this process, these cities draw more attention to the shame of the Legislature’s inaction, then so be it.

Village People

"Similar anti-discrimination policies are common in the Idaho workplace, at companies such as Micron Technology, Albertsons and Hewlett-Packard."


So state law is now similar to corporate policy?

Great, if every company and city adopts a "similar policy" of their own free will, then the state law will not be necessary and there won't be any frivolous lawsuits jamming up the legal system.


The legislature is filled with cowards.

When hundreds of people show up to support having a hearing on an issue and they vote no on whether to even hold a hearing, and then run out the door (they did just that) - COWARDS.

Notice the party-line vote.

The legislature is filled with REPUBLICAN cowards. What kind of government is it that can't even talk about issues?

Notice the party-line vote.

How terrifying to think these geniuses might risk not being elected.

'Cowards' is synonomous with