The decision by ExxonMobil subsidiary Imperial Oil to seek a new route for its three-story-high shipments is a victory for Kooskia residents Linwood Laughy, his wife Borg Hendrickson and Peter Grubb, co-owner of the River Dance Lodge in Syringa, and ROW Adventures.
These Idahoans took on the state and one of the biggest corporations and won. Imperial is spending an additional $72 million to break down 145 of the Korean-built modules and ship them on alternative routes.
The lawsuits the three brought along with Idaho Rivers United and other environmental groups became a national cause célèbre against the tar sands oil fields where the modules were bound in northern Alberta. Their fight to simply keep their highway open for emergency vehicles, anglers and floaters became a part of the larger fight to block approval for the Keystone XL Pipeline from the tar sands region to the Gulf.
This weekend, thousands turned out to circle the White House in opposition.
Idaho’s other interests in the shipments, the future of the Port of Lewiston and the ability of other shippers to move smaller and fewer larger loads on the state’s highways has been lost in the specific fight to protect the Wild and Scenic River corridor on U.S. 12. which snakes up the Clearwater River past Orofino and into Montana. But its not for lack of use of the power of state government.
The state’s industry lobbyists got fully behind the effort to permit the loads at all costs even though there was little economic benefit for Idaho. Unlike many of the state’s traditional industries, the oil industry has shown it will pay whatever it takes as long as it is profitable to do what it needs to do to drill, ship and deliver its products.
Imperial was told the shipments through the Port of Lewiston would not be a problem if a few power lines were moved, a few trees trimmed and it paid for extra Idaho State Police patrols. In the end Imperial is paying $500,000 per module to break them down here so they can use another route.
One could argue that more jobs were created in Idaho by the environmental law firm of Advocates for the West in forcing the alternative routes than all the state and industry lobbying combined.
What didn’t happen was a complete public process before Imperial was told it would be able to make the shipments. It had already begun shipping the modules to Lewiston in 2010 before any official approval based on assurances from Gov. Butch Otter’s administration.
It wasn't until public safety issues from blocking the highway were identified. It took a lawsuit for consideration of the implications for the Wild and Scenic River corridor to rise.
Would Imperial be better off now had the public process come before the shipments arrived in Lewiston? We’ll never know.
And Imperial wasn’t the only company that paid. ConocoPhillips only wanted to move four loads but is plan got caught up in the fight over Imperial’s 205 loads.
ConocoPhillips had to go all the way to the Idaho Supreme Court to get its shipments approved. The oil refiner’s experience demonstrated just how hard the over-sized loads would be to ship over the route that Lewis and Clark took in 1805.
Imperial said it isn’t giving up on the U.S. 12 route and that’s keeping opponents vigilant.
“While we’re celebrating Imperial’s immediate change of plans, the long term threat remains,” said Kevin Lewis, Idaho Rivers conservation director.
The uncertainty for the future of the Port of Lewiston also continues. But for Laughy, Hendrickson and Grubb life along the Lochsa may get back to normal for now.

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
good work
awesome job. maybe there is a god, and he isn't owned by exxon afterall...
Environmental Lawyers Are The New Ambulance Chasers
"little economic benefit" apparently doesn't include the fact that the ENTIRE corridor was widened and resurfaced and primarily financed by those companies. Laughy, Hendrickson & Grubb and the enviro lawyers ought to have to pay for some of the benefits they receive from the improved access. They weren't harmed or damaged by any of these loads and this is just one more example of how lawsuits are won based on "what ifs" rather than sound, solid information/data...
People who support these groups should be more aware of just how much money it's actually costing them to do nothing more than pay lawyers & lobbyists- Billions - Paid for enviro-suits every year because it doesn't actually cost the lawyers ANYTHING to file this stuff - but they can sure make a sweet living - Out of the thousands of enviro suits being brought or fought every year, only a small percentage are actually relevant to doing a bit of good for the environment.
*******************************
"I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him." Galileo
Speaking of "sound, solid
Speaking of "sound, solid information/data", why don't you try reading the article before you comment.
Kooskia
Take another step backwards - don't have much going on for ya in Kooskia so let's hold up progress for the rest of Idaho................
??
what are you blathering about? how is denying access to a highway to someone that's just passing through, a step back for idaho? the shipments are going to canada...
you people need to RTFA.
What of Lewis and Clark?
When did they ever drill for oil? Moot point.
----------
Everybody wants to hue the knurled
Woohoo!
This is a win for the 99% in my opinion.
There is no 99% you jackwagon.
----------
Everybody wants to hue the knurled
Need to learn lessons
For some, the issue was never whether it was good or bad to run the loads over Highway 12. Rather, it was concerns over the process -- or lack there of. Without any public input, the state told the companies that they would be able to move the loads over Highway 12 and that any hearings or permit approvals would just be proo forma. And where did ITD have the hearings on this, Lewiston, Kooskia, Orofino? No. They had them in Boise. So the next time they are proposing something on the interstate between Boise and Ontario, will they have the hearing in Lewiston? Also, the companies were insistent that the size of the loads couldn't be reduced. But that's exactly what they have done. People who have a distruct of government should be up in arms
about this entire process.
With the way OR Dept. of Travesty works, SURE!
----------
Nailed him!
Stay vigilant
The fat lady works for Exxon and she's still lurkin.
Who Gave the Initial Okay?
We will probably never know, but the investigative press should strive to find at what level assurances were given to Exxon Mobile that Highway 12 could be used.
It can be assumed that Idaho government will not investigate.
It can also be assumed that a company as successful as Exxon Mobile did not undertake a plan costing $ millions on simply the okay from some employee of Region Two of ITD.
The republican governor of Idaho and the democrat governor of Montana surely were personally involved in promising something not in their power to deliver.
You wanna settle down before the coronary thrombosis, pilgrim?
----------
Everybody wants to hue the knurled
Otter, Luna etc.
If memory serves it was those 2 plus the Transportation Board that gave the initial approval with no studies done. Only way people even knew about it was when they started relocating power lines and building the turnouts on 12 and the cargo started showing up in Lewiston.
Luna?
Why would Luna have any input on this decision? His arena is education.
Big Oil and the sc*mbags politicos
One for the good guys. Congratulations and keep watching.
BTW Statesman. Your filter needs fixing. It is really stupid.
That would be a DIY as they laid off most of the IT staff.
----------
Everybody wants to hue the knurled