Tea Party Boise newsletter says issues matter, not party

The latest edition of the Tea Party Boise newsletter says the group will remain nonpartisan and look "for good new candidates to replace politically entrenched incumbents."

In the newsletter published Tuesday, writer Nancy Armstrong asks, "are prepared to continue the battle of dismantling unconstitutional government policies and programs? Are we committed to this end -- demanding fiscal responsibility, less government, lower taxes, return of state rights and protection of private property?"

Armstrong writes that the group will support "candidates who promote conservative values, including, fiscal responsibility, limited government, lower taxes, and getting federal government out of state business."

The group holds its first annual meeting on March 13, from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the Courtyard Marriott in Meridian.

Armstrong writes that the 2,000-member Tea Party Boise will also "hold politicians accountable for the promises made to their constituency," "demand transparency" and "offer continuing education on issues that impact our freedoms."

Armstrong also writes that the group has "no intention of pitching any candidate based on their political party affiliation. Neither will Tea Party object to a party, an independent, a Libertarian or other who embraces Tea Party ideals. Tea Party has weighed in supporting a candidate, like in VA, NJ and Mass. Republicans, they all ran on very solid fiscal conservative views while responding to their constituency’s concerns."

You can follow Idaho Statesman Politics on Twitter.

Party doesn't matter because it's Republicans in disguise...

Transformers 3.

----------
Like a midair collision with a tugboat

Freedoms lost

Will someone please point out the liberties that have been taken away by Obama? It seems to be a central complaint of the tea party ilk.

So, being for smaller, less intrusive government, and all about individual freedom, can I assume the tea party stands firmly against marijuana prohibition? Do they have a position on this issue? If not, why not?

Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

*pounds shoe on podium

----------
Like a midair collision with a tugboat