British Columbia first government in North America to institute carbon tax

The United States is deep in a debate about how to address climate change as people from five U.S. states and three Canadian provinces and the Yukon are in town for the 19th annual summit of the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region, a public-private partnership chartered by the legislative bodies of the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan and the states of Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington.

The House passed a complicated bill which would cap greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent and allow polluters to trade allowances to pollute to ease the impact. It called a “cap and tax" plan by Republicans who essentially are arguing that the way to address the problem is to provide incentives for all energy sources.

Regional leaders at the conference say they can learn from each other how to address the tough issues of the day. The most unique approach came a year ago from British Columbia. They were the first government in North America to institute a carbon tax.

Here’s how it works:

The provincial government taxes, carbon-based fuels — gasoline, diesel, natural gas, propane, coal and home heating fuel — at $10 per ton of greenhouse gases generated.
The carbon tax rate rises by $5 for years, until it hits $30 per ton of greenhouse gas in 2012.

The provincial government is expected to earn $1.85 billion over three years which it gives back to taxpayers in tax breaks.

BC cut income tax rates for the first $70,000 earned by five per cent this year and the corporate tax rate was cut one per cent. The province issued a $100 rebate to every adult and child last month to offset the cost of the carbon tax.

When it was started a year ago the new tax increased the price of gas 2.4 cents a liter and it gradually rises to 7.25 cents more by 2012. Natural gas and and fuel oil prices also rose.

So instead of putting in place a complicated trading system that opponents say could be manipulated, BC’s carbon tax simply makes using fossil fuels more expensive so consumers seek alternatives. So what happened to Premier Gordon Campbell and his Liberal Party when they passed this revolutionary system?

He and his government were reelected in May.

They are Canadians, Rocky. It's not a CARBON but a FUEL TAX.

Where did you acquire the semantics to call it anything else?

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...

I wish the U.S. congress was so farsighted

You should have heard Barbara Boxer crowing over the trillion dollars she was going to get to spend because of new carbon taxes.

Truth is hard to come by

Just because they were first doesn't necessarily mean much ...

... does it? Taxing as a mechanism in an already over-taxed economy does not mean there will be no emissions.

All BC did was to identify a new revenue source/stream so companies can either pay more, or less, based on reported emission levels. Isn't it easier to "pay to play" than not to play at all? I don't think long term environmental sustainability (or stewardship) is gained when there are no requirements to reduce the carbon footprint from all sources in the first place --- that means carbon emissions from both industry and mobile sources. All government gets is more money, and taxpayers have less money in their pockets as increased taxes on fuel cover the costs at taxpayer expense?

Will duplicating this BC model be a new mission for Idaho DEQ and its parent company, Region X EPA?

If so ... we are all in very big trouble as the Governor will be looking at this new revenue stream to fund his "Idaho Road to Nowhere" agenda.

Revenue Neutral

BC has among the lowest taxes per capita of anywhere in North America. Its carbon tax is revenue neutral. Its program is a tax shift with people who use more fossil fuels paying more.
By going to a high mileage car you can immediately cut your taxes.

A tax is a tax

A tax is a tax is a tax -- whether called users fees or whatever. Someone pays and someone gains. It is also known as pay now or pay later, but nevertheless, you have to pay. /Jono

Climate change

is the ultimate pay now or pay later issue.

A warmer earth

Would be a far more livable place than a cooler one. These scare tactics are lame.

Truth is hard to come by

You'll be dead also. Why DO you think we're supposed to survive?

Stop being so super-assumptive. We are guaranteed NOTHING.

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...

We are all full of carbon. Any guesses?

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...

Most libs I know just want to tax rich people,

not the middle class.

Most libs I know are nice old ladies trying to keep our lib open

You open all those new libs and our town plays football with our lib.

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...

Tax wildfire emissions

Maybe the FS would stop the insane "let it all burn up" policy.

Wildfire Tax

That is an idea that needs to be examined.

Smoke and subsequent decay from wildfires are the largest single source of CO2 emissions in the Pacific Northwest. Way (way) more than automobiles, small business emissions and farting cows and cattle combined.

If Idaho gave tax breaks to everyone who used electricity from bug killed or fire killed trees, all kinds of good things would happen -- assuming users were able to use dead trees from federal lands, of course.

How about a new "let it burn in a cogeneration plant" policy? That would make great sense on a number of levels.

Decay would make a lot more sense.

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...

Only if you hate logging, rural employment, and ugly landscapes

"A lot more sense" for What, FO?

Most rotting snags and large woody debris go through at least one or two additional wildfires during their existence. In the interim, they're unsightly, dirty, and dangerous and their value as "habitat" is grossly overrated (to be polite).

Take a pill. I have male PMS today.

It's not like you made any sense in your comment either. C'est le bonne or however.

Good night. Your idiocy is all your own for the rest of the day, kids. My day belongs to me today.

----------
There is no life in Idaho...it is a mirror site on god's server. You were dreaming but it is over. Go to your residence and await our commands and THEN we will restore control...