How should the Idaho media cover racist groups?
| Share |
While James von Brunn was walking into the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C., rifle in hand, readers at the Spokane Spokesman-Review's popular Huckleberries Online blog were debating how much the media should cover racist groups.
As the day unfolded, museum guard Stephen Tyrone Johns was dead, and details about the suspect began to emerge. Von Brunn, 88, has spent decades espousing racism. In 2004 and 2005, von Brunn's life journey through the politics of hatred that took him to Hayden Lake, the former home of the Aryan Nations white separatist compound.
Which throws the media back into the delicate business of trying to decide how to cover the shadowy travels and the vitriolic politics of the racist fringe. I wish this story would go away. More than that, I wish the rhetoric would fade away. I'm afraid I see neither happening.
And after decades of covering people such as James von Brunn — who rewrite history to serve warped aims, and who besmirch Idaho in the process — I still don't think we have a formula. If such a formula exists.
The Spokesman-Review opted not to cover the most recent round or racist fliers, distributed in Coeur d'Alene by the latest crop of white supremacists. Huckleberries blogmaster Dave Oliveria posted the fliers and engaged his readers to discussion.
The fliers give conspiracy theory a bad name, espousing a truly bizarre scenario of race revolution. It's sick stuff. The Spokesman-Review decided any coverage would give these wannabes the publicity they crave.
I'm not going to second-guess. The Spokesman-Review's editors are on the ground — and while they didn't ask for any of this, they have years of experience make news decisions about attention-seeking racists. And it's not like I have any great advice to offer anyway.
In April, I wrote an editorial saying Idahoans — including our elected officials — should move proactively and say that a new Aryan Nations group does not speak for all Idahoans. I was quickly challenged by readers who reminded me of an editorial I wrote shortly after the November presidential election. In that editorial, I explained that the paper does not and will not cover isolated and unsubstantiated racist threats and statements.
I guess the line I'm drawing here — and not very artfully — comes down to the presence of an organized movement. If one person or a few people espouse racism, is it news? If a small group is trying to recruit members to their cause, does that constitute a movement?
And what constitutes an "organized movement?" A few distributed leaflets? A parade float? This isn't a Rotary club; it's hard to get a gauge on membership numbers.
No, I don't have the answers. Worse still, perhaps the questions are moot. As we learned Wednesday, it only takes one James von Brunn to act on racist extremism — and thrust Idaho back into the story of the white supremacist movement.
(For more reading: For some journalists, covering racism is a chilling proposition, as illustrated by this remarkable column in the Miami Herald.)
Get Twitter updates on my blog and column and Statesman editorials.
Become a follower here. On Facebook, join the Idaho Statesman
Opinion Page Group for updates.
- Kevin Richert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
More of the same
Whether it's racists, eco-terrorists, or anti-abortionists killing someone in a church I think much of their motivation is media attention. "I'm such a loser that I have nothing going in my life and if I do this, people will know me and revere my name for 'the cause'".
The flip side of not covering such things is the wackos may feel they have to step up the severity to get their desired media attention. "if the news didn't cover my internet buddy's pipebomb, I'll have to use a truckload".
It's a tough spot for media- how can the media help prevent the continuance of the problem? That elusive answer should be the policy.
Kevin
the Miami Herald link doesn't work.
Link is fixed ...
thanks for the head's up.
Kevin Richert
editorial page editor
Racism is a cancer
that certainly won't go away if its ignored. It needs to hauled out into the cold light of day for all to observe. Its everybody's problem. This and other papers have a very important role in accomplishing it.
The same way you cover any other group
California and a number of other states have way more "hate groups" than Idaho has, but somehow Idaho's reputation has become tainted as racist. Check out the "hate map" at the Southern Poverty Law Center: http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp for a detailed breakdown.
Thanks for the link. But it also depends on how you look at it.
California, with the largest number of SPLC defined groups, has 1 group per 437k citizens, while Idaho has 1 per 214k citizens. If you look at the composition of the groups you will see that Idaho's are all essentially neo-Nazi/white supremacy groups, which is the reputation Idaho has when discussing racism. California has a wider diversity including black separatists, radical Catholics, anti-gay, anti-immigrant, and Jewish Defense League (!?), as well as Klan and skinheads.
Didn't see an anti-brussels sprouts group, so I guess I'm a loner when it comes to what I hate.
Thanks again for the link; SPLC is a great resource for this subject.
Turn the tables
Orrrrrr, The Statesman could be an edgy leading journalistic sensation and cover groups like Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam. Of course the follow-up story would be Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The tie in story would be the relationship between the two 'leaders'.
Ahhh, think of the potential journalism awards!
Relevant much?
Good idea cause their massive presence here in Idaho resonates so strongly with the populace.
Relevence
And you only expand my point Sisyphus, "their presence in Idaho" is lacking and that is material to our perspective and for our local "whitey" journalists.
Vicki Gowler
Kevin Richert
Rocky Barker
Dan Popkey
Cynthia Sewell
Tim Woodward
Ed Lotterman
Pete Zimowsky
Patrick Orr
Michael Deeds
Even the sports guy, Brian Murphy, is white.
Where is the diversity in the Statesman??? Granted, the publisher, Mi-Ai Parrish, adds some ethnicity to the watercooler, but really.
KR, asks how should Idaho media cover racists groups? How about getting reports from a journalist who has the whole perspective?
In the relative world, Idaho doesn't know racism like much of of the country. So I would say it's impossible for our Media to cover the whole story. What we know from Northern Idaho is a bunch of ignorant white boys, and we know about 9 gang banger in Caldwell arrested for dealing.- Whoopee! We are nowhere near Jackson Mississippi, the South side of Chicago, the Bronx, or Brownsville Texas.
I had a conservation with a young man from Georgia not too long ago and I asked him what percentage of the US Population is black. He replied, "about 60%". See, it's all in your perspective.
You have to be of color
to cover racism? That's ludicrous. Wouldn't that level of subjectivity call into question your bias to flamers like yourself? But I certainly can see where more information could definitely help you. The racists moved to Idaho precisely because we're largely homogeneous. Any educated reporter would know that.
Purple
No, one does not have to be of color to cover racism or bigotry.
But one's perspective influences the coverage. And for most Idahoan's our perspective is 'colored' with a big white brush. When you answer the question, How should Idaho media cover racist groups, that has to be considered.
And if racists move to Idaho because we are homogenous, then where were they before? In a mixed culture? Is that what generates hate? Ahhh, here in lies the Louis Farrahkan reference.
Google up
white flight and ask yourself what complexion of politics all those California immigrants to Idaho might be sporting.
Flight 357 is now departing
"complexion of politics"?
****
What does that even mean?
Is that like a latin woman being smarter than a white man as a judge?
What's the matter Pimp? Black man keeping you down?
Maybe you wouldn't have so much hate if you would stop looking at interracial porn.
Full Color
Now you're just being hurtful. ;-)
Yah know, there are black pimps, too.
All the brothers are real disappointed BP.
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.
Your cronk is gettin old.
fresh it up alittle.
Whose cronk is chronic?
I am old too.
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.
What coverage?
On the subject of coverage --- where is the Statesman's coverage of the slaying of the U.S. Soldier in his recruiting office in this country. He was murdered by a black man who said it was done according to the teachings of Islam Too controversial for McClatchy?
If Yahoo! ain't got it, AP ain't got it and the paper ain't...
CITE. You must think they are god on N. Curtis!
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.
This is a very serious issue
This is a very serious issue in our State; the silence of the Idaho Statesmen and our politicians on racism is extremely dangerous. The Statesmen’s use of silence is tells all Idahoans it approves of all forms of racism and they should ignore it and accepted it as a fact of life. You can accept this or engage in honest dialogue, identifying racists and educating all Idahoans about these radical hate groups to help communities eliminate this behavior. Yes, it is a delicate balance of self responsibility by journalists to manage emotions dealing with race issues, but it must be done.
To willfully ignore all forms of racism, enables those racists and maintains the ignorance’s of the racial challenges of living together in a democracy. Racism in Idaho is predominantly white’s who cloak their outright hatred behind flag waving, misinterpretations of the U.S. constitution & extremist faiths providing them with a false sense of justification & legitimacy for there hateful values.
This has nothing to do with "Freedom of speech". These are despicable forms of behavior cultivated by fear and bigotry.
We must not allow racists to seize any moment in time by dictating the terms of public discourse without a rapid response to their racist views against any fellow Idahoan. These times demand more from our citizens, our states major media and political leadership.Racists do not crave media coverage; they crave the control of public discourse as they operate in the shadows. Those who do crave media coverage are our intolerant & discriminatory friends cloaked in there extremist christian movement.
Racism is very serious human behavior that always leads to a form of violence, exercising restraint is a failed policy and an even weaker tactic in combating intolerance. Not responding to the racist’s behavior or actions allows them a superior emotion and confidence that they are untouchable assuming the white community and it leaders will do nothing to stop them because deep down inside the white community approves of their racist’s actions.
Why are law enforcement and elected politicians not enforcing the laws and why is the states largest newspaper ignoring them as oh, that’s just an old white guy mouthing off he’s harmless, really.
What we do know is that the white race is destined not to be the majority race in our lifetime, what happens then Idahoans, when you’re the minority race; will those in the majority treat you as you treated them?
This is a lot of immature bawling on your part. Rejoin us.
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.
How about more of a focus on Stephen Johns?
And less information about the sick person who killed him. Instead of giving this guy personal notoriety, make Mr. Johns the fallen hero. Every news story I've seen in the last 24 hours started with a photo of the killer. Instead of focusing on these individuals and their extremist beliefs, focus on their horrible crimes and the victims
As far as I've seen TONS of notice has been given to Mr. Johns.
Every newscast leads the story with "He was trying to be nice and help an old man in when the killer drew a rifle and gunned him down...his colleagues quickly returned fire, hitting the gunman in the face, among other locations. If he lives he will be charged with first degree murder"
Then they show the interviews with family and friends.
Then they started the Hayden, Idaho link story.
Warts are warts. To make some of the outrageous claims being asserted here is not only irresponsible but lacking in morals, as dangerous as Bryan Fischer only in reverse.
Some of this is trying to bait us into a flame session. I may feel like using the other r word soon but I'll flag before that happens.
Grow up, kids.
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.
Media Role
"We are all sufferers from history, but the paranoid is a double sufferer, since he is afflicted not only by the real world, with the rest of us, but by his fantasies as well." It seems to me that the media contribute to the paranoia if they do or don't cover certain topics. On the other hand, who is going to provide the information we need to better understand the world. if not the media?
In Obituaries, when they pass.
----------
Supporting nothing everywhere all day and very well.
Thank you for hollering.