Do Democrats close the doors only when it really matters?
Democrats say it wasn’t a policy change, but they held their first closed-door party caucus in several years Tuesday amid the debate on raising fuel taxes.
With majority Republicans under fire for closed caucus meetings several years ago, Democrats decided to open their meetings. Typically, party caucuses are announced on the floor and Democrats in both the House and Senate welcome the public and reporters to attend. GOP meetings in both houses remain closed.
On Tuesday, Democrats asked for a recess just before the House was to vote on an amendment to increase the fuel tax by four cents a gallon. The 18 members entered a room just off the House floor and closed the door.
Upon a knock by a Statesman reporter, Rep. Phylis King, D-Boise, opened the door and was asked, “Is this caucus open?”
“No,” replied King, shutting the door. The meeting broke up within minutes and Democrats reaffirmed their opposition to fuel-tax increases this year.
Caucus Chairman Bill Killen, D-Boise, later said he was unaware of the request by the newspaper to observe the brief caucus. “I’m sorry you got locked out,” Killen told the reporter. “For what it’s worth, the vote was to stick to the caucus position.”
Just three of 18 Democrats supported the four-cent increase, which was defeated. Democrats have generally opposed fuel-tax increases because of the recession.
Killen said Democrats have not changed their policy to allow open caucus meetings.
- Dan Popkey's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
Of course
The new Democrat mantra: We'll be better than the Republicans at _____________, except when we're the same.
Hope and change.
You are so RIGHT! Hypocritical isn't it!?!?!?
The democrats have always held private closed meetings to discuss stategy. Then they talk about it in the charade they call an open caucus. You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. The media just finally caught them.
Take the decision to oust Clint Stennett. You know it was all talked about and decided before the formal vote.
And they voted behing closed doors?!?!?! Of course they did. Amazing!!!
Ousted?
Think_again:
You are wrong about this one. Sen Stennett was not "ousted" in any sense of the word. He is on a leave of absence while recovering from treatment for a brain cancer. His temporary replacement, Sen. Thorson, is in attendance every day.
He was OUSTED from leadership.
Senator Stennett is a good man and leader. He did not deserve to be treated that way. My point is that the strategy and decision was done behind doors.
He has BRAIN CANCER. Find your train of thought and board it.
----------
There are idiots in all manner of ways, ask me and I'll demo them. It won't be too hard.
maybe good headline at the time, but a bad idea in the long run
The open door caucus wasn't a very good idea to begin with. There are times when they need to discuss strategy without their opponents having access to that information.
Gasoline Tax
It is a reasonable way to pay for highway use. All who drive help to buy the roads. Recession or not, good transportation corridors are essential to productivity. Pay as you go is much better than credit crunch.
No, sometimes I leave the door open even though the heat runs.
----------
There are idiots in all manner of ways, ask me and I'll demo them. It won't be too hard.
right
The Republicans have a closed caucus every time and get no criticism for it; the Democrats do it *once* and get an article about it.
Sometimes it must be closed or the family requests it.
----------
There are idiots in all manner of ways, ask me and I'll demo them. It won't be too hard.
When the Repubs meet, it stinks. We're thankful for the door.
Kevin, get a gasmask, throw some flashbangs then rush in.
I'll cover ya.