Some good open government news

Not all is cloudy on the Sunshine Week front.

Earlier this week, I wrote about Idaho's lackluster efforts in making public records available online. I researched the issue on behalf of Sunshine Week, a national organization that spotlights the value of public access to government records. Idaho wound up tied for No. 40 in a national ranking of online records access.

Now to a double serving of good news from Monday's Senate State Affairs Committee meeting. The committee introduced a bill that would require elected officials to file financial disclosure reports, and approved a bill to put some teeth into the open meetings law.

Idaho, a state that prides itself on a citizen's Legislature, is also one of just three states that doesn't require lawmakers to disclose who they work for, or where they have business interests. It's a fundamental disconnect. Senate Majority Leader Bart Davis, R-Idaho Falls, and Senate Minority Leader Kate Kelly, D-Boise, have collaborated on a bill to fix it.

Kelly has been pushing this idea for years, but has run into resistance in the Republican-controlled Legislature. That's why it's encouraging to see Davis on board, along with Senate leadership from both parties. With the backing of the Senate's most influential players, this idea has more momentum than ever.

Why, one of these days these reports might be public record, and easily accessed online. We can only hope.

Attorney General Lawrence Wasden's office has taken the lead on the open meetings bill.

The most important part of this bill tightens up a gaping loophole in the law, as the state Supreme Court has interpreted it. An elected official now must "knowingly" violate the Open Meeting Law in order to face any civil penalties — a legal hurdle that is all but impossible to prove.

The rewrite revamps the penalties.

A first-time violation, willful or inadvertent, can result in a civil penalty of up to $50. The law now sets the fine at $150.

Repeat offenders — or any officials found to "knowingly" flout the law — can face a $500 civil penalty. The law now calls for a $300 fine for a repeat violation.

This change makes the law more enforceable, especially for first-time offenders who could now plead ignorance of the law. It encourages elected officials to understand their legal obligations to conduct the public's business in public view. That's in everyone's interest.

Granted, media groups have been active on this issue. And, by way of full disclosure, I am vice president of the Idaho Press Club, one of the groups working on this bill. The club supports this rewrite.

But open government serves the citizenry, not just the media. That is the underlying message of Sunshine Week. And it's why, for anyone who cares about transparent government, Monday was a very promising day in the Senate State Affairs Committee.

Click here to learn more about Sunshine Week.

Get Twitter updates on my blog and column and Statesman editorials. Become a follower @KevinRichert. On Facebook, join the Idaho Statesman Opinion Page Group for updates.

GO GO GO

Thank goodness for the democratic legislators in Idaho...

Now for the knowingly part...If all Idaho officials mandatorily train on the law, then when they violate, we will know they knew what they were doing.

It will only go underground, it somebody wants to be bad...

----------
Gilligan inhaled

Open Government meeting Friday

Please come to the Star City Hall at 10:45 a.m. Friday for a public meeting about open government. This national Webinar lasts until 12:30 and is interactive.
Kip

Then what is the address of it for those who can't make it?

Open as hell, I suspect.

----------
Gilligan inhaled

great to see this moving forward

wonderful to have bipartisan support on it.

$50.

KR, seems you have a typo- first time violation is $50? Perhaps it ought to say $500.

And employees

While this is a great step for openness of 'elected officials' it is often the employees really putting the jelly to the taxpayers.

Recall the county clerk up North sending all the forest clearing contracts to her relative (whom did not do the work). And how many purchasing agents favor a family member's business in closed deals.

As for the open meetings, I am convinced most govt business gets done in church groups, on the links, the pubs, and walking down hallways. The meeting is just the formality.

***
There needs to be broad state wide laws applicable for all state, county, and city employees against conflict of interest dealings, and shady decisions.

****
As for financial disclosure-- might cause less good people to run for office due to their desire for privacy.
Perhaps a provision to allow for a blind trust instead of financial disclosure. ??

Does that mean they'll starve only on state pay?

NOBODY but the exercise therapy lady at the senior center will run then because she would join the Peace Corps anyway.

----------
Gilligan inhaled