- IdahoStatesman.com
- Blogs
- Bronco Beat
- Murph's Turf
- Varsity Extra
- Idaho Newsreader
- Inside Idaho Business
- Commentary: Kevin Richert
- Letters from the West
- Helping Works
- Idaho Politics
- Inside the Idaho Legislature
- Into the Outdoors
- Living The Dream
- What We see
- Words & Deeds
- The Beer Nut: Patrick Orr
- What's Online
- TechIdaho
- The Cinemaniac
- Recent Posts
- Content
When lawmakers won't police themselves
Submitted by Kevin Richert on Wed, 11/19/2008 - 12:50pm.
For those of us in the Greek chorus clamoring for open government, a recent study on government integrity comes as no surprise.
Idaho ranked a dismal 44th in the nation in an "integrity index" released by the Chicago-based Better Government Association.
Idaho's score was a mixed bag — its whistleblower law tied for ninth in the nation, while its open meeting law ranked 44th. But Idaho's low ranking can be attributed in large part to lawmakers who have been unwilling to police themselves.
Idaho was one of one three states to score a "perfect" zero on conflict-of-interest issues, a well-earned mark. Idaho legislators — citizen lawmakers who spend nine months of the year working their day jobs — are not required to file reports saying who they work for, who their clients are, or where they invest their money.
Idaho lawmakers are supposed to disclose potential conflicts, but they do so on the honor system, sometimes to less-than-desirable effect. Just three years ago, Kuna Republican Sen. Jack Noble was forced to resign after an ethics panel concluded that he had pushed a bill that would have directly benefited his grocery store, without revealing his conflict of interest.
This recent history is well-known to 69 of Idaho's current class of 105 legislators, who served in office when the Noble investigation unfolded. Yet lawmakers have bristled at the idea of a conflict-of-interest law, questioning the need for disclosure.
I don't understand what they're afraid of.
Lawmakers often sing the virtues of a citizen Legislature, saying the part-time political work forces them to remain grounded in the day-to-day issues that affect their districts. Good point. But you can't have it both ways. When public officials also are private citizens, their constituents ought to be able to see for themselves how these elected lawmakers balance the two jobs.
Legislators shouldn't pass a conflict-of-interest law to curry favor with a good government think tank in Chicago. They should do it to solidify their contract with the voters.
Click here to download the report.
»
- Kevin Richert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
That's fine. You write a bill and find a sponsor and it'll be OK
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
Lawmaker and Officals
Kevin, it's not just the *lawmakers*.
It's also Commissioners, councilmembers, and board members, not concerned with what their government employees are doing.
P&Z employees with business relationships with builders and developers. City employees with direct relationships with contractors of the same city. Government employees profiting with their own business in their employment field. Govt attorneys with business partnerships with people doing business with the same agency. Former councilmembers exchanging land with the city they served. ETC.
Just like in the financial markets that brought to this collapse-- as long as everyone is making money and getting by, the gatekeepers do not care.
Conflicts of interest. Laziness. Ignorance. Cronyism. Entitlement. Greed. Sefishness.
They are not necessarily making the laws and they are also not aware of the current laws.
And when they are aware of the law, sometimes there is NO bite to the law. For example, parts of the FOIA have NO penalty for not following the law.
Great point ...
... your comments are absolutely correct and not only apply to lawmakers and public officials. The same applies to newspaper reporters and editors who never seem to declare a conflict of interest or to refrain from a bias when they "report the news" or express grandiose opinions.
So, when does the finger-pointing stop?
Point and Shoot
Well first the finger-pointing has to point to the problem.
Then we have to collectively solve the problem for the future.
Case in point the legislative/govt/lobbying revolving door. Malmen was one that got the finger pointing, the Statesman at least made a point of it for a short while with a couple articles and now the Legislature is doing something about it.
Problem is, the media is shy to shine the light on these problems to begin with, and when done the public generally has other things to worry about other than if the local council is ripping them off. Or they are too stupid to be concerned about it.
Yzaguirre is a great example- he was a business crook yet he was elected to county office. Do his supporters expect him to do 'the right thing' when business comes before the Commissioners when he couldn't do it before?
Bottom line is most of the people are not paying attention to our government.
For those actually paying attention, the media is bias and therefore a large part of the people actually paying attention don't trust the media.
Want evidence? look at the blog to your left called "Your Local Government".
We the People are Getting Hosed
Speaking of our local government. (copy paste from my other post)
Now we have the 36th roundabout and extension to Cartwright.
Guess who stands to benefit a TREMENDOUS amount with this upcoming ACHD project?
The Tertelings. Terteling Company owns the new project property on the corner of Hill and 36th. And of course they owns HUNDREDS of acres along Cartwright exactly where the new road will dump onto. That land is sheep habitat without the extension. With the extension it will be a developer's goldmine!
Coincidence or just good planning on the Tertelings part? Put all this together. Not only do the own the intersection on Hill road, but all the land on the other side (which they have for years) and the land they previously sold. It's like Ada P&Z/ACHD is a cash cow for some people.
Even if you accept the 36th project is a good thing and you like foothills development, add the fact ACHD started this back in the mid 1990s. Does it have to take 10-15 years to put in a new intersection? In 2000 Boise City identified it as the #1 priority. Awwww, 8 years for a #1 priority! 3.5million per the 2006 CIP.
To see this area go out to Hidden Springs via Cartwright Road. All the surrounding area along Cartwright road is owned by developers. Yet it is taxed as agricultural and therefore taxed at $40-45/acre. Adjacent "Bare Land" is taxed at $3,600/acre. When a known developer owns 400-1,000 acres it is obvious they are not using if for agriculture purposes.
IF the county taxed the property appropriately, more money would flow into the coffers for the foothills roads (Hill Road, 36th, Pierce Park, Cartwright). INSTEAD we get a Krap job recently completed on Cartwright Road- for what? A nice section of road that ends in a dirt road barely wide enough for one truck (Pierce Park). And the other route has a similar funnel.
As this ends up, in a few years 36th Street coming up to Hill be be exactly like Warm Springs is now-krammed. So much so, ACHD wants to put in a roundabout on WS too, just to use up some federal money. Of course if ParkCenter Bridge, were done timely, WS would be only marginally bad.
Best as I can interpret them, impact fees are a set amount per household. Never mind if the road improvement is for a million house, it's the same fee as small house. Indirectly, p&z has an incentive to allow dense housing in the foothills to get more impact fees. It's still just 5 miles of asphalt whether there's a Pamula Hiatt house or a bunch of starter homes.
Although, now with the 36th St extension it should be a nice road from Hill all the way out to Hidden Springs- courtesy of Ada taxpayers. Specific projects like these should be funded entirely by the landowners. In fact, the developers should be required to contract with private companies to the do work and pay for it. Instead, taxpayer resources will be tied up for months. No wonder ACHD has such a long worklist. They are doing the developers (Terteling & SunCor) work for them.
On the other side of the slope, Seamans Gulch still is still two tight lanes without a bike lane. Hidden Springs is supposed to be a 'recreationalists' place. Good luck riding a bike in or out of the area.
Terrible job ACHD and ADA P&Z! Good job to the Tertelings expanding your wealth!
Be thankful the $10,700,000,000,000 national debt is virtual.
Since it increases about a million dollars every ten seconds you gotta feel good about that. Politicians use campaign finance to pay professional writers to dress it up & it's all good, right? Add in the $2 trillion for the infrastructure because our representatives took campaign contributions & handed out tax cuts & what do we have? Developers making bank? Did they contribute? Maybe it was just a kickback nobody knows about in the good old boy family.
Funny how our representatives can ask the big three if they flew their corporate jets when they never asked the oil, AIG, mortgage, & who did I miss, if they flew their corporate jets, no doubt a tax write off. Bush flies the friendly skies united, right? These politicians who take all this money through campaign finance don't turn it down when they hand out our tax $ in cuts & incentives, do they? They never ride the corporate jet to campaign?
It's ok when you read about it happening in Idaho where we're $240 million short for roads & the Idaho Tax commission lets big corporation off the hook for million because they're heavy into tax knowledge. How did Otter's flunkyy word it? "You can't bully them."
The big three must have selling what we wanted, can't swing a dead cat without hitting a SUV or big truck. What does Dubya drive, a Toyota or Datsun?
opensecrets.org, followthemoney.org show who contributes, who receives, & we all know who gets the tax cuts & incentives like the corporate jets. If we demanded full finacial dislclosure by our representatives, like Paul Harvey says, we'd know the rest of the story.
ewg.org shows which corporate farmers get all the money, your tax $ in subsidies. You might be surprised how much some of these farmers are making. When I lived in Nebraska that web site hit the paper & you should have heard the corporate farmers squeal like a pig. I though Deliverance was making a sequel. Funny how they can't stand to have the rest of the world see the millions in tax $ they get yet accept it so graciously. They drive all the best cars & trucks & have all the big equipment. They buy up all the family farmers who go out of business with tax $ from subsidies. Nice gig if you can get it.
Look at the paper with all the news on DUIs, our elected officials never took any money from alcohol companies did they? They can't understand why alcoholics can't kick the habit yet they pay state employees to sell it, provide benefits, & love the tax revenue? Kicked tobacco companies for money & we can't touch the $82 million like some states do. How is alcoshol any different than smokes? Thousands of people die every year from alcohol related auto accidents, everybody is contributing to our politicians who pushed the mob aside so as to make the money, even MADD contribute to these clowns we call representatives.
Richert does Casablanca's Claude Raines: Faux astonishment
Jack Noble was fingered because the year earlier he'd been the only hold-out to Qwest's corp-demanded deregulation that failed (by his single vote), and they tipped off Popkey, who can refuse to disclose his sources. After Jack was exposed, the new pending Qwest bill sailed thru nicely in an intimidated Chamber... off pounding the bozo Noble.
The Statesman's complete lack of journalistic backbone in these matters, whether legislatively, or on the University Place affair, or even allowing Idaho Power to get off scott-free when their incompetent power-planning & management costs the Treasure Valley 2 major interested employers....is exceptionally shoddy field journalism or just basic Sacramento corporate cowardice, in the face of declining ad revenues.
Well guys, you now get the "inherit the [economic] wind" of your own "efforts"....here's to McClatchy selling you to a Hagedone or Cowles.
What the hell are you talking about anyway?
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
A "QM" Production!
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.