Jeron Johnson says he must change his ways; thoughts on scheduling

By Chadd Cripe
ccripe@idahostatesman.com

Boise State sophomore safety Jeron Johnson said there’s nothing the coaches can do to help him avoid the personal fouls that have cost him and the Broncos dearly this season.

“It’s on me,” he said. “… I don’t know how to do it — to think while it’s going so fast — but I’m going to have to figure out something because it’s killing us. It will hurt us in the long run.”

Johnson was benched for two series in the third quarter last week at San Jose State after he hit a receiver late on an overthrown ball on third-and-long. The personal foul kept the Spartans’ drive going, and they eventually scored a touchdown while Johnson watched from the bench.

“I was just searching to make a big play, that’s all it was,” said Johnson, who was ejected for a similar play against Oregon. “It was adrenaline, emotion. It was just a stupid play by me. I knew afterward (it was a penalty). I was hoping they would have held the flag.”

I’ll have much more on Johnson and his personal fouls in Friday’s edition of the Idaho Statesman.

•••

I keep seeing people complain about Boise State’s schedule and nobody seems to understand the one truth about it: You can’t control how good the teams you play are.

Think of it this way: Everyone loved Fresno State’s schedule because they had games against Rutgers, Wisconsin and UCLA. Those teams are a combined 10-14.

As a result, Fresno State’s schedule is rated 107th using the old BCS format. Boise State’s schedule is rated 79th. (By the way, TCU’s schedule is 72nd and Utah’s is 75th).

The problem is that scheduling is done well in advance. Boise State has seven games scheduled against BYU and Utah from 2011 to 2015. Those games look great now. But who’s to say those teams will be good then? Boise State played BYU in 2003 and 2004 — and the Cougars posted two losing seasons.

Another example: I heard lots of complaining when the Broncos scheduled Tulsa for next year. However, that would be a terrific game this year between two undefeated teams. By next year, who knows?

This year’s schedule should have been much better for the Broncos, but Bowling Green and Southern Miss have had severely disappointing seasons. Southern Miss, in fact, is about to post its first losing season since 1993.

Not even the big boys are reliable anymore. Utah’s win at Michigan doesn’t look like that big of a deal this year. Neither does BYU’s win at Washington. Or UNLV’s win at Arizona State. Even Boise State’s win at Oregon has been questioned because the Ducks had quarterback issues.

So while scheduling bigger names might keep the fans happy, it won’t necessarily help the Broncos’ chances of crashing the BCS.

Keep up the intensity JJ.

Keep up the intensity JJ. You’re a great play maker.

Schedule Wine and Cheese.....

Everybody needs to calm down about the scheduling. Pac 10 and Big Ten teams only want to play us at their house and usually as the opening game of the year. They know that we can beat them in Boise, so they will almost never come here. Its just not that easy to schedule good teams. Oregon was ranked in the top 5 last year until their quarterback got hurt. Now this year comes and we beat them but the win doesnt count for much because they are having a down year. Bleymaier cant control how good a team is going to be the year that we play them. A Pac 10 home and away game each year and a MWC home and away is about as good as it will ever get so you better get used to it. We used to be able to schedule BCS teams (UCLA, Arkansas, Wisconsin) but that was because they saw us as an easy win on their schedule. Now that we are hard to match up with, no one wants to play us. Losing to us makes them look really bad.

Bye the way, have you seen the non conference schedule of most of the SEC teams? The Vandulls could beat most of them. BSU isnt the only school sceduling patsies guys.

SEC schools

can do that because during conference play they play tough teams nearly every week. BSU doesn't have that luxury.

So Bleymaier does't schedule BCS teams unless he is able to get a home-and-home. Fair enough, but if he really wanted to schedule up, wouldn't he take a one-and-done every now and then? I don't think BCS schools are scared of losing to BSU, it's a $$ game. Thye take in more money playing non-conference home games than they do from playing BSU in Boise, even with the payout.

Schedule

If you would have said 6 years ago the conversations being blogged right now about Boise State football were a reality, people would laugh you out of the room you were in. BCS, Playing on New Years Day, Perennial Top 20 teams, PATIENCE BRONCO NATION!! In another 6 years Bronco Stadium will hold 45,000 + and the big boys will do a home and home...you watch and see...Bleymeir, Peterson and Kustra have the Broncos on the perfect track and this train is going at light speed. By 2015 there may be teams coming to Boise that you could only dream about right now.

Then

everyone will talk about the good ol days when seats were only 25 bucks and will be mad at Mr. B for the expansion or some other dumb reason.

It's a lose-lose proposition...for them.

What major team wants to schedule a game with a team like BSU? Yes, chances are pretty good that an Ohio State or Penn State would beat the Broncos, but there is also a chance that on that day, BSU will bring their A+ game and the big guy will have an off day. If the Broncos win, the other guys take it in the shorts for losing to a mid-major. If BSU loses, there's still no respect because the Broncs are supposed to lose!

The only team to come out OK regardless of the final score is Boise State - if they win, it's a huge upset and if they lose, well, as long as it's not a blowout, they're the tough underdogs that put up a valiant fight. Now why would any major school want to put themselves in that position?

Oh, and Jeron Johnson has got to get his head in the game. He's got the capability to be an extraordinary player, but he summed up his biggest fault by saying that he was "searching" for a big play. He doesn't need to search for the big plays - all he needs to do is be aware of what's going on around him and the big plays will come to him. Striving to make big plays the way that he's doing it shows that he needs to work on the one thing that has always put Bronco football over the top - teamwork. By trying to force big plays, all Johnson is doing is attempting to shroud himself in personal glory. The problem is that it's coming at the expense of his team.

jeron

yo jeron,keep playing like you are.we need what you bring.set the tone at nmsu.

ABSOLUTELY...

This game is about "slobber knocking hits" and physically defeating your opponent...this aint flag football and your opponent doesn't wear skirts...they'll be looking for Jeron and those receivers will grow alligator arms real quick...this aint a game of kiss your sister...those boys will just have to tighten their jockstraps and chin straps...keep bringing it Jeron...as my old high school coach (Buddy Ryan) use to say..."if you are going to get a major personal foul...make it a good one". Ronnie Lott would never have made it to the Hall of Fame if he played "tag, you're down"..Nitzski, Butkus, Noblis, Lanier, Wilcox, Schmit, Urlanger, Lewis and hundreds more "head hunter backs" would have been out of football if they had to play "kissy kissy" football. When you can say "I don't want some back or receiver to ask who hit me, I want them to know who hit them, then they will have fear and lots of fear...great weapon that word FEAR!!!" No since in taking names and kicking b-tt, kick b-tt and then take names...its the name of the game!!!!!

Jeron at NMSU game

Am sure New Mexico State wide receiver Chris Williams is looking forward to being hit by JJ. ;^)

CC

I hope your edition on Friday isn't overly critical off JJ. The last thing we need is to drum up more support that the Broncos are dirty. I think he's an aggressive player who as a young guy gets caught up in hearing the "ooohs and awwwwwsss" of the crowd.
I think he will eventually be a smarter player and still be aggressive...how scary will that be?

Scheduling

The big schools don't seem to be afraid of scheduling the likes of Fresno (who has upset plenty of teams). So I don't bye that. We need to schedule a few more BCS conference schools. I can't believe that schools like Iowa St, Indiana, Baylor, Kansas St, Miss St, Pitt, and the such would not be willing to schedule a H & H. They are not upper tier BCS schools, but they are BCS conference schools none the less. We need to have a Pac 10 H&H(UO, OSU, WSU), a Big 12 H&H(Iowa St, KST, Baylor), a MWC H&H (BYU, UU, TCU) each year. A schedule with those types of teams should be doable. Yes, some of those would not do much for our SOS. But we would be playing the same teams that the others are playing in conference. BCS is still BCS. As far as travel expenses go, those midwest destinations should not be that bad.

Its like the song

Money Money Money! Simple as that! BCS schools lose money coming to play in a 30k seat stadium when they can sell out 60k plus seats. The only legit way to get teams to come here is we the paying fans would have to pony up the coin.
Example- 2 for 1 Boise plays at Georgia and gets a pay day!
Georgia comes to BSU Bleymier doubles the ticket prices and Georgia only losses a little money by coming here. Or the one and done. Its all about the quan remember that. Big teams don't play at BSU becuase they lose money by doing so. LSU played Tulane the last couple years buts in an in state game away from Baton Rouge so they can still make some money. Other than that we're not going to see the big boys until we get at least 15k to 20k more seats in the stadium.

SEC

You also have to realize, that many BCS conferences, like the SEC, set the ticket price for any game they play in, regardless of where it is played. For example, when an SEC school plays away at a CUSA school (Southern Miss, Memphis, Tulsa) the ticket price for those games goes up, not because of the "caliber of the opponent" or because its a "marquee game" but because the SEC has a policy about ticket prices for their games. When Tennessee plays Memphis, in Memphis, basic seats in Memphis go to $50, The SEC sets the minimum price. Would BSU fans be willing to to pay double for a home game against the likes of Ole Miss or Auburn, no matter how good or bad they are?

Yes.

Yes.

ADD LIKE`

an extra 30 to 50 bucks to my season tickets price, heck yeah I'd pay it.

Playing Smart

For Jeron this means thinking fast while playing fast... Others do it, he can, too. The young man is a good player and seems like a good person - else why would he even discuss the situation? Hopefully he'll get it turned around before the 'physical' label becomes a 'mental' one.

As far as scheduling goes, Gene Bleymeyer is smart to do what he's done; insisting on home-and-home series with BCS teams - and NOT over-scheduling...

Pat Hill gets a lot of positive press for his "anyone, anytime, anywhere" mantra, but it kills his team in the long run. This year is a great example - and it's only the latest in a long line of them.

The hype and attention the Broncos are getting for having possibly a THIRD undefeated season in five years far outweighs the advantage of scheduling like Fresno. We're in the hunt for another BCS bowl and solid recruits are lining up to have a chance at a sunny future in Boise.

Gene - Don't change a thing!!!

Exciting

I get thrilled for games when they are against good opponents with proven track records. I would have never dreamed schools such as OU, Oregon, OSU, Georgia would even be in the same stadium as BSU let alone across the field. Games such as the one coming up there is no excitement for me except getting to see a team that a follow very closely, know the name and styles of the key players, play a game they should win very easily. I would like to see better teams play Boise but the formula is working out great. I think we need to get in another conference. What is it now? Since we've been in the WAC how many times have we won the conference?

keep up the good work

keep up the good work johnson, dont see many pass coming your way. the pros like big hitters.

JJ Just Needs to Keep Playing Hard

When a hit comes late or a receiver stops on the play and gets tagged unsuspectingly, then a player is flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct and is sometimes ejected from the game. For the defender it becomes a matter of to hit or not to hit and the decision must be made in a split second, although to all who are watching it looks too obvious what should be done. I am sure that JJ is not a dirty player, but someone who just made poor decisions in that split second. It is evident that we can't afford to be without JJ in the lineup. JJ just needs to keep playing hard and hopefully make the right decision.

Admitting to Having a Problem is the First Step...

Glad to hear that you're acknowledging the problem, Jeron, because you are one talented Bronco. But Broncos also mean having class, and late hits are definitely not classy. Play hard, play smart, JJ. You can do this. You're a Bronco.

Republicans for Obama / Veterans for Obama

If BSU joins the MWC......

You will likely never be heard from again because you will have multiple losses and once you even have one loss, no one will care anymore. But at least you will be brought back to earth somewhat instead of living the fantasy that you are somehow legit on a national scale. I haven't seen a team in a long time who has got more mileage out of one win than you did at OU. I would love to see you play them this year and then all of that past would be forgotten or at least put in the proper perspective.

I just don't get it

Why do people like you even read these articles? How could you possibly even care?

Tide, I doubt you'll be reading any of these comments, but just in case you do: a lot of the people on this board are WAC fans. That means they're smarter than you. We also know you're not a MWC fan. Otherwise you would know that Boise State is undefeated this decade against MWC teams— that's a better record than they have against the WAC.

I guess it doesn't matter where you're from or who you root for because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. I guess people just get bitter when there are four ranked non-BCS teams who just didn't get the message that they were supposed to lose.

Love to prove you wrong

but 'your team' probably doesn't want to play BSU. They say that is because BSU is not good enough - but, it seems to me like you are ScArEd..... Whimp. :)

Don't complain about how 'bad' BSU is unless you give them a chance to win or loose on their own accord. Bring it on, and let the cards fall as they may. Until then, keep your foot in your mouth, where it probably spends most of its time, anyway.

Here is a novel concept - lets have a playoff system instead of this BCS garbage and settle this issue once and for all.

Chadd Cripe

Hey Cripe, did you ever consider that when you play those teams, maybe BSU will no longer be any good. If you were in any of the conferences you mentioned, you are looking at 2 to 4 losses minimum each year; gone would be the gaudy and fake, misleading record from playing in the wacky wac.

If Boise joins the MWC

Tide. Excellent point. I'm sure they will have multiple losses. As they are currently 11-0 against MWC teams.
Dream on...
They will have a tougher schedule no doubt, but come on. It's not like the MWC is far superior. Boise would consistantly be one of the top 3 teams. Maybe better.

MWC vs WAC?

Fact is the MWC's football record vs. WAC teams is 2-25 or something ridiculous like that. I find it hard to believe that if Boise State joined the MWC that we would be losing 2-4 games per season as Tide remarks. Now if Boise State were to join the SEC next season, then maybe we would lose a game or two, but we would still be ranked in the top 10 just because of our SEC status. Seriously though, we will continue to level the playing field as our recruits get better and better over time. It is just an uphill battle to recruit NFL talent at this time, but maybe not so difficult in the not so distant future.

could be worse....

....hey we all agree, to some extent, that Johnson has made some bad decisions to this point, but you can't accuse him of playing without passion. He is still relatively young, a sophomore, and give him some time, he'll wise'n up.

Until then..here is to the defense, also...cheers to: 2 undefeated seasons in 3 years!

Go Broncos

Removed

doh!

JJ, s of s complaints, and the Tide...

JJ, you're very smart to have given that little interview and ADMITTED you're at fault with these monster hits. I was thinking you were a real loose cannon out there, but now I have a new, vastly improved, image of you. Yes, you need to grow some additional decision making skills. And you sound exactly like a kid who will. You've got a really awe$ome future with the NFL if you can harness this. Strength of schedule whiners - wow, what a bunch of 20-20 hindsight I read about here! Look, the people in charge of this know what they need to do. They are trying to slowly get BSU into better and better games. And as mentioned, they do not know early on who the good teams are going to be. Geez - look at the top ten teams right now. 'nuf said. And now for Tide - and I am assuming this is in conjunction with Crimson, not the laundry detergent? What on earth are you doing hanging around a BSU site? I mean, come on. You spout off a lot of just stupid stuff which the others are totally calling you to the carpet on, with statistics and facts! As for winning "at OU" as you said, it wasn't AT Oklahoma bonehead. It was in Arizona. And did you actually watch that game? BSU lead through three and a half quarters. LEAD. Like, was winning. Then DID win!
Cut your losses man. Go somewhere where you'll find at least one person who understands you. Newsflash - it ain't here.
GO BRONCOS!!!

Chadd!!

Of course scheduling is done well in advance, but it really isn't that difficult to schedule good teams because you would actually be scheduling top programs from major conferences. Boise State has a consistent record of winning because of an outstanding coaching staff, and an excellent program of developing young players. Anybody scheduling the Broncos knows that they will bring it on game day whether it's 2010 or 2012.

The difficult issue is all about the money based on stadium size, the attraction to TV networks, travel costs, etc. In the example of Fresno State this year, I think you have to look at the intent of the folks doing the scheduling. It's obvious that Fresno was trying to set up a tougher schedule by including schools from larger conferences. I don't think you can say that about Boise State right now.

Strength of Schedule

The BCS rankings account for strength of schedule in the six computer components. Strictly by computer rankings, Boise State is tied for seventh, with Utah and Oklahoma State. They're ahead of Texas Tech and Florida and just a bit behind USC.

In the six computer polls, BSU ranks between 5th and 10th. Now, that may say something pretty critical about the computer polls because the Harris and USA Today polls differ by only 0.6 percentage points (solidly in 11th place).

Computer Top 10:
1 Texas
2 Alabama
3 Penn St
4 Oklahoma
4 Georgia
6 USC
7 Boise St
7 Oklahoma St
7 Utah
10 Florida
10 Ohio St
10 Texas Tech

and what about USC?

I laugh when I see where USC is. They're a one loss team and #5. That would be understandable if they lost to the Longhorns or something, but it was to the Beavers! Look at who they've played so far this year. It's a veritable list of "who's Not"! The only ranked team they've played according to the stats right now was Ohio. A team the likes of USC should have away tougher schedule.
I'm not saying BSU has beat anything all that hot, I'm just laughing at one loss USC sitting up there so high. I will be happy to see BSU play some better teams as the years roll by, and I think they will. It's a long slow climb, but look at how long we've been in this division. Not too shabby!
GO BRONCOS!

both way

You can`t have it both ways. Bash USC and bragg about an Oregon win. The statement "a list of who`s not" fits BSU closer then it does USC. The Pac-10 is soft this year but this is the first for many and will probably be the last for many more years

I'm not really BASHING USC, just observing

Just saying that a USC team with so many 5 star recruits should be having a better season in a very weak Pac 10. No one can argue that the Pac 10 is very good this year. USC is impressive when it comes to holding opponents scores down, but don't you think, in a rather weak conference this year, they should also be undefeated to be #5? I'm not comparing BSU to USC. How can anyone do that? USC gets 4 and 5 star recruits. BSU gets the best they can, but they are not USC level players.
Well, at least not at first! ha ha! Wait until Coach Pete is done with them. ; )