Who is the West's next federal landlord?
One of the great parlor games of the West is to guess who the next president will choose as the Interior Secretary.
The man or woman who will succeed Idaho’s Dirk Kempthorne will be the nation's top wildlife manager, federal landlord of more than 507 million acres of national parks, rangeland and wildlife refuges.
He would manage more than 600 dams that bring water to 31 million Westerners and irrigate 60 percent of all the vegetables grown in the United States. He would be in charge of the fate of 1,265 threatened or endangered species.
He would be responsible for 68 percent of the nation's oil and gas reserves and millions of acres of federal mining lands. The next president’s choice for Interior also will sit on the Cabinet, discussing the major issues that face the nation and the world.
First look at McCain. Would he keep Kempthorne on? Any independent observer would have to say Kempthorne has helped boost the reputation of the Bush Administration after the Interior’s lowest moments since the Teapot Dome controversy.
The convictions of Deputy Secretary Steve Griles for has dealings with corrupt lobbying Jack Abramoff, the recent scandal uncovered in the Minerals Management Service and the blatant meddling in scientific decisions on listing endangered species undercut the integrity of the agency that has so much control over the West. All of these happened on the watch of Gale Norton.
Kempthorne has helped restore and grow funding for national parks, listed the polar bear as endangered, acknowledged the role of climate change, taken responsibility to clean up MMS and improved employees’ morale. Kempthorne has at least made the case that keeping him on through the transition would allow McCain to focus on the economy and other challenges.
Others mentioned include Colorado Republican Sen. Wayne Allard, a states rights advocate who is stepping down from the Senate, Rep. Steve Pearce, a New Mexico Republican likely to lose to Democratic Rep. Tom Udall in their race for the Senate.
Neither one of these picks will make environmentalists happy but Allard has supported some environmental projects in Colorado. If McCain wanted environmental support he might step out of the West and pick Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who has a great environmental record in the Senate. His wife, Honey’s father used to be the mayor of Couer d’Alene.
One woman I would include is current deputy Interior secretary Lynn Scarlett. she was unscathed by the mismanagement under Norton and shares McCain's environmental, libertarian philosophy.
For Obama I’m hearing California Democratic Rep. George Miller as a candidate. The former House Resources Committee chairman is an expert on Interior and has strong support among environmental groups. He buys into the new collaborative approach to public lands management. I watched him work on a committee at with Idaho Fish and Game Commissioner Cameron Wheeler at a collaborative workshop held in 2001 in Red Lodge, Mont. And they came away with common ground on a proposal on how to streamline federal land management decision making. He also has supported GOP Mike Simpson's Boulder-White Clouds wilderness protection bill.
John Leshy, the former solicitor under Bruce Babbitt and Bill Clinton, and an Interior veteran going back to Cecil Andrus’ days there is another name that comes up. Leshy, a professor of law at the Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco also served as chief counsel under Miller in on the Resources Committee. He also has environmental support.
Montana Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer would be the obvious choice since he has become one of the West’s leading voices on Interior and energy issues. But Schweitzer has said he wants to stay in Montana. We’ll see.
Others thrown out there are Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico, who is going to be up for several Cabinet posts including State, Rep Jay Inslee of Washington and Colorado Rep. Mark Udall, if he loses to Republican Bob Schaffer for Allard’s Senate seat.
If he wants to go outside of government, Obama might choose Sally Jewell, CEO of Recreational Equipment Inc., and leader in the Initiative for Global Development, which is a group of business leaders seeking to end world poverty.
- Rocky Barker's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
Regardless of Whomever Is Elected
the next Secretary will preside over a more competant and ethical department because I believe the other political appointees will be chosen based more on their competence and judgement than ideology.
The incompetence and corruption in the Dept. of Interior under Bush is shameful and a disgrace to the Republican Party. Unfortunately, it was not confined to the Dept of Interior.
Competence over ideology
It remains to be seen what Obama will do as a president, presuming he get's in. I am not at all confident that he will choose competence over ideology. Obama has surrounded himself with deeply ideological figures for a great deal of his life. I don't see him changing those habits now.
McCain also remains to be seen, though he seems to be more pragmatist than ideological. His libertarian leanings could make a difference, but many bills he has backed in the Senate have been decidedly not libertarian.
Of course, sometimes prior performance is a poor indicator of future actions. George Bush was a pragmatist as the governor of Texas and then took a ideologic turn as President. Now he is moving back towards a pragmatic stance with economic issues.
Truth is hard to come by
You Are Correct P.J., The Truth is hard to come by......
Anyone who knows about Obama's days at the notoriously nasty & partisan Harvard Law School Review should be aware that he negotiated those teacherous waters with an even hand that gained the respect of the conservative members (that he appointed as editors!).
Then there are his "ideological" economic advisors - Warren Buffet, Bob Rubin and Larry Summers. McCain's = Phil Gramm!
Obama's "idealogical" foreign policy team - Susan Rice, Anthony Lake, Richard Lugar, et al. McCain's = Randy Scheunemann.
Obama surrounding himeself with idealogues? A surreal comment that seems like it was emitted by the Alice In Wonderland McCain team.
Pass me another Geritol and Root Beer float, please?
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
EWYK
All of the examples you cite are good ones, but they are also recent. If that is the course Obama chooses through his presidency, the country will be stronger for it. However, for the last twenty years Obama has found himself in close company with many who profess a hatred for America, and there are to many for it to just be a coincidence. If that is the path he treads as President it will lead to his downfall.
Truth is hard to come by
PJ, The Harvard Law School Example
is hardly recent. His record in the Illinois and US Senate is one of pragmatism and moderation. I am not sure who you are referring to, but you appear to be repeating the thoroughly discredited myths promoted by McCain.
Wow eatwhatyoukill
I feel educated now. I had absolutely no idea that it had been disproven that Obama spent twenty years in a church led by a racist pastor, or hung around with an unapologetic terrorist (and then lied about it.) I must have just been to busy clinging bitterly to guns and religion to understand that everything negative said against my government messiah (marxism rears it's ugly head) was proven to be untrue.
Truth is hard to come by
PJ, Well I Think We have Exhausted This
You had said that Obama's pragmatic, moderate stance was "recent" and I pointed out his remarkable, moderate tenure as editor of the Harvard Law Review. You responded - not with anything fresh or thoughtful - but with the completely discredited McCain talking points. You should listen to Colin Powell's (that notorious idealogue!) endorsement of Obama today......along with most newspapers in the country. He laid waste to the McCain lies, as so many others have done.
But, your final sentance is absolutely accurate "Truth is hard to come by".
Wealth redistribution is not a moderate stance
and better than 80% of Americans are against the idea. Obama clearly stated he was for the idea. Of course the answer to that brief moment of honesty has been to try and destroy the man who dared challenge him. I find nothing pragmatic about that, just the same old smoke and mirrors deception which you have so clearly fallen for. Obama is what he is, and you can't spin your way out of that. The question is, will he be a Jimmy Carter and press a to liberal agenda and destroy his own power, or will he be a Bill Clinton and pragmatically embrace where the country is going and co-opt others ideas as his own?
It seems to me that the answer will be the second, but not until after a couple of losing battles. Both Clinton and Schwarzenegger followed that particular path. The only caveat I have to that is that Obama has spent a lot of time in a liberal echo chamber, and it may come as a shock to him that others, even in his own party, aren't going to go along with his marxist leanings.
But then, they might just be clinging bitterly to guns and religion (a near perfect quote from Saul Alinsky.) Yeah, couldn't resist that other McCain talking point, just like the McCain talking point of "I'm going to spread that wealth around." I just hate it when McCain tries to make McCain look bad like that.
Truth is hard to come by
Gee PJ
Where is the wealth "redistribution" that you claim? You mean because the wealthy will have to pay taxes too? Is that wealth "redistribution?"
Your whole tirade is simply childish. You know full well that Obama did not hang with Ayers, nor did he lie about it. He did not choose the members of that board, and working together hardly made them pals.
Even if they were the best of friends, Obama has shown himself to have much better judgment than McCain has. McCain's choice of Palin, his robot-calls about Ayers, and his inability to understand the financial crisis reveals that he does not belong in the Oval office. This is not the same McCain of 2000.
You are so mired down in Republican double-speak, that you have lost all perspective on the issues. You used to be thoughtful, and immune to the GOP rhetoric, what's happened?
I don't have a problem with progressive taxes
They end up balancing out a bunch of regressive taxes we have, like sales tax. I do have a problem with people who don't pay income taxes getting money handed back to them that was taken from the wealthy so they can have a "hand up." America is a guarantee of opportunity (theoretically) but not of equal outcome. Equal outcome means everyone is equally poor.
Obama has had quite a few encounters with Ayers, and he has clearly lied about it on several occasions, including the debate. Are you so mired down in your democratic ideals that you can't tell truth from lies? It's as clear as the nose on your face that Ayers was not just "Some guy in my neighborhood," and that he did launch a political campaign from his house, which he flatly denied during the debate.
This is an election, I don't like Obama, I have no apologies for that. I don't know why my thoughtfulness somehow has to hinge on my agreement with the liberals on this board. You obviously have swallowed the Obama line, even the lies, hook, line, and sinker, I at least will take a critical look at "my" own party. Tell me, are you going to vote for a single republican in november? I know of at least one democrat that I am supporting.
Truth is hard to come by
I Guess There Is Some Life In This
We will see about the 80% in a couple of weeks.
A rational tax system is a moderate stance. Repeatedly calling Obama's tax plan "wealth redistribution" does not make it so. Perhaps you would like to explain how lowering taxes on those making less that $250k /year is "redistribution". Do you have an AGI over $250k? It's simple. If you don't, you will get a tax break under the Obama plan. Obama will be a Clinton like figure in that he knows that this is a center - right country and he knows that results - even incremental results - are what counts. McCain has no fiscal plan that differs from Bush's. Any thoughts on Bush's $5 trillion increase in Federal debt and the fact that McCain voted against the Bush tax cut....until he decided he wanted to succeed W?
The notion that Obama "destroyed" Joe the Plumber is pure pure Fox / McCain nonsense. After McCain put the poor guy in the public eye, the press (not Obama) moved in to show that every one of Joe's & McCain's premises was false if not a lie. The whole thing was emblematic of the lousy McCain homework and pathetic spin. And now the "destroyed" meme....come on!
I would be interested in the Alinsky "bitter" quote.....or approximation.
I didn't say Obama's tax plan was wealth redistribution
Obama did, or hadn't you heard? A curiously honest moment in a political campaign.
McCain talks plainly about what he believes, I don't think Obama does. We will find out when he actually gets to act on it, I hope you're right.
On the 5 trillion dollar deficit increase. I am not going to pretend that republicans are fiscal conservatives. Bush didn't see a spending proposal that he didn't like until democrats took control of congress, and I am furious about that.
Here is the quote I believe Obama was paraphrasing from "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky
In case you think this is a stretch, look back to the photo posted on Obama's web site of him teaching at a Chicago University with the words "Power Analysis" and "Relationships Built on Self Interest" written on the blackboard — key terms utilized in the Alinsky method.
Words don't just appear out of mid air, they are the product of an education, and Barack appears to have had a fair amount of education from proteges of Saul Alinsky. When he says change, he means it, but not what most people are thinking.
Again, you could be correct about his incremental idea. Liberal ideas that are embraced on the federal level are almost impossible to turn back, so he might accomplish his goals by just laying a few more platforms. As a conservative I will oppose that, as a pragmatist I will look before I leap. For instance, I am open to the idea of a single payer health system, as long as we can outsource the legislation to a country who has gotten it right.
Truth is hard to come by
Apparently you and I watch PBS.
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
Obama's moderate stance
So the fact that Obama received the New Party’s endorsement in his first run for office in 1995-96 cannot be dismissed as insignificant. On the contrary, Obama’s ties to the New Party, and the New Party’s backers at ACORN (often the very same people), are long-standing, substantial, and reveal a great deal about his personal political allegiances. Because it was a fusion party, the New Party did not require that all the candidates it endorsed be members. Yet the New Party’s endorsements were carefully targeted. There was no attempt to endorse candidates in every race, or even to set up nationwide chapters. Carefully selected races in carefully targeted cities were seized upon — and only when the candidate fit the profile of a decidedly left-leaning progressive Democrat. In this way, the New Party set out to form a hard-left “party within a party” among the Democrats.
Stanley Kurtz
The article is VERY well sourced so don't even try to pull the disinformation line on me.
Truth is hard to come by
PJ, You have Worn Me Out.
It's like playing whack-a-mole.
Seems like we will all have the opportunity to see how Obama will govern. If candidates govern like they campaign, things are looking up. However folks may try to tie Obama with radicals and radical ideologies(smear, in my opinion)...he has run an extremely diciplined, competent and focused campaign....in contrast to McCain and all the other candidates.
It's like playing whack a mole
because there is SO MUCH information out there to disprove you point. I haven't even begun to post it all, I didn't want to overload the board. These aren't made up accusations like you are claiming, they are real facts. Whatever else Obama has done, he has consistently aligned himself with the farthest left people he can come into contact with. He has managed to hide this in his campaign, and may be pragmatic enough that he will just leave it all behind him, but that doesn't change the fact of what he has done in the past.
If you are pulling for a far left candidate, then more power to you, there is nothing wrong with that. Just don't fool yourself into thinking he is something he is not.
Truth is hard to come by
A guy, obviously.
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
libertarian?
McCain libertarian!! What a joke. He doesn't have a libertarian bone in his body.
He doesn't even...aw, forget it, and you'd think so.
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
He's a BONELESS Libertarian. Glad he's not SKINLESS too.
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.
Aw Gee Whiz
For Rocky to call John a libertarian basically tells you what Rocky is. And his suggestion that George Miller would be interested in any sort of real collaboration is also indicative.
One thing is certain: The West, at least the cultural and economic Old West, will not benefit much in this election. For McCain, the best case is benign neglect, pretty much the same as it was with Bush 2. The only difference might be a little less neglect as shown by appointees such as Dale Bosworth/Mark Rey on one hand, and Gale Norton on the other, oh, and I can't forget Fran Mainella with NPS...funny how she jumped in bed with Bill Wade's Parks are for Bureaucrats, Not People the very day she was no longer constrained. If Lynn Scarlett is a carry over, the fact is that she's been a nonentity her entire tenure.
With Obama, because he is so urbanized, I feel it certain that both the Forest Service and BLM, DOI and USDA, will wind up with the appointed slots being filled directly from the eco-groups. That will be the green "reward" for their loyalty and political support, to be allowed to punish the public lands dependent communities that will vote for McCain out of simple self defense?
How about Jamie Clark at USFWS again; Gloria Flora leaving her goat farm for the USFS; Leshy as BLM Director --
Scary stuff.
Ladies and politicians, I have in my possession a mail-in ballot
Sealed by my some Hermes with a Tic in a Bartles and James box to remain crispy until the USPS got to my mailbox!
You talk about SEVENTEEN HUNDRED in Ada County WELL!
Those are the number of Oregonians who filled it out and didn't even have to USE A STAMP! Because WE have drop boxes...TODAY ALONE, on the way from WORK, in the privacy of their LONESOMES...
Why it boggles the Idaho state government. And I'm Matthew LESKOW~~~HAH!!!
In one way I'll ne able to compemplate how to gloat in a politcally correct manner (there is none) in three weeks or at least tell you I was the first in my precinct?
No, not to get a Red Ryder BB gun. It's just the stupid Presidential race again.
But let's GET IT ON!
I'm gonna finish watching Woodstock!
Might as well, my Schwinn got stolen last night.
----------
If this had been an actual troll post the attention seeking you just read would've been followed by screaming, name-calling and cutting and pasting for no apparent reason. We now return you to the Idaho Statesman already in progress.