- IdahoStatesman.com
- Blogs
- Bronco Beat
- Murph's Turf
- Varsity Extra
- Idaho Newsreader
- Inside Idaho Business
- Commentary: Kevin Richert
- Your Local Government
- Letters from the West
- Into the Outdoors
- Words & Deeds
- The Beer Nut: Patrick Orr
- What's Online
- Nonprofits
- TechIdaho
- The Cinemaniac
- Idaho Politics: LiCalzi
- Idaho Legislature: Labrador
- Idaho Legislature: Langhorst
- Forums
- Recent Posts
- Content
Idaho's Bigfoot expert says latest find is uncompelling
Submitted by Rocky Barker on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 8:43am.
When reports surfaced that a couple of would-be Bigfoot hunters had a sasquatch in their freezer Idahoans knew the story was going to end up on the desk of Idaho State University’s Jeff Meldrum.
Meldrum, an associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at ISU and an affiliate curator at the Idaho Museum of Natural History, is one of the few college professors actively researching the existence of Bigfoot. He has brought science into the search for a large human-like beast that long has been considered a possible inhabitant of the Pacific Northwest.
For Meldrum the issue is simple. Something is out there. .
“As incredulous as these reports may seem, the simple fact of the matter remains -- the footprints exist and warrant evaluation,” Meldrum writes.
The Georgians who announced that they had discovered a Bigfoot in the southern woods did not impress Meldrum. Speaking Sunday in Edmonton at the Royal Alberta Museum, Meldrum said the evidence was not compelling, according to Canada.com.
"It didn't have the bulk or the mass. It seemed to be vacuous, the hair did not look natural and the face bears a striking resemblance to an off-the-shelf costume,” Meldrum said.
Now I get skeptical anytime I hear the words professional next to the words Bigfoot hunter. That’s how Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer describe themselves and they looked cheesy on TV.
Here’s the pictures that Meldrum found uncompelling. These guys make themselves easy to dismiss.
But Meldrum can’t be ignored. He’s not ready to say Bigfoot exists but he studies in the realm of the scientific uncertainty where their remains an unlikely but plausible case these creatures have existed in the wild without discovery.
Here is a television report about him.
»
- Rocky Barker's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
It just seems to me that someone should have stumbled across
big-foot remains by now. Bones last quite some time, as does hair. The woods are full of people in even the most remote places, so why haven't dead bigfoot been found?
I'm just sayin'...
Not that full
You raise a good point but if you live in the mountains like we do and spend as much time as we do in the hills you would see the difference. I have never seen a bears remains or elk or few deer in the deep out of the way places. Nature birds,coyotes,foxes and natures smallest creatures will strip a dead annimal faster than you think and larger animals will scatter the bones and few people can identify what annimal they came from after that.I have left boned out elk on a hillside and a few weeks later nothing was left of them. We live in Salmon and you can drive into the hills and go all day without seeing another soul and then only on or near trails. There are so many areas near here that never see anybody except during hunting seasson and IF there is a intelligent creature it is not impossible for them to avoid human contact except for those rare occasions when they are seen. Who knows if it is true but I can tell you in washington and northern Idaho there are vast sections of forest that are nearly impassible and visibility is limited to a few feet . I am skeptical of the latest report and the way it is being handled but I believe there has to be something going onto generate all the interest. Would love to believe in it maybe someday.