- IdahoStatesman.com
- Blogs
- Bronco Beat
- Murph's Turf
- Varsity Extra
- Idaho Newsreader
- Inside Idaho Business
- Commentary: Kevin Richert
- Your Local Government
- Letters from the West
- Into the Outdoors
- Words & Deeds
- The Beer Nut: Patrick Orr
- What's Online
- Nonprofits
- TechIdaho
- The Cinemaniac
- Idaho Politics: LiCalzi
- Idaho Legislature: Labrador
- Idaho Legislature: Langhorst
- Forums
- Recent Posts
- Content
Areva's arrival shows America's lost nuclear leadership
Submitted by Rocky Barker on Wed, 05/07/2008 - 8:54am.
Nuclear engineering leaders like Idaho Falls’ brilliant Chuck Till regularly predicted in the 1980s that if the United States didn’t increase its spending for nuclear research and education it would lose its leadership to France and other countries.
Jump forward to Tuesday. Areva Inc., the French-government-backed corporation was announcing its plans to build a $2 billion uranium enrichment plant near the Idaho National Laboratory in eastern Idaho. The plant is a part of the French company’s strategic effort to build the United States’ new generation of infrastructure for the nuclear industry.
Chuck Till’s prediction was coming true. The nuclear power technology the United States invented at the Idaho National Laboratory is now dominated by France. Unlike the United States, France never suggested alternative energy was a choice between nuclear, solar and wind. It pushed and supported all of them.
France didn’t take the American route on nuclear waste that lead to the idea of burying perfectly useful spent nuclear fuel at still unbuilt Yucca Mountain. It strategically decided against “out of sight, out of mind,” the American waste approach. It has recycled its fuel all along, reducing the amount of long-lived waste.
This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. It’s not about pro-nuclear versus anti-nuke. The Reagan and both Bush administrations paid lip service to nuclear power but never really pushed it. Bill Clinton killed Till’s brilliant idea, the Integral Fast Reactor, which would have been passively safe, recycled its own fuel and burned up most of the longest life waste products. It actually would have created more fuel than it used, a key issue if nuclear power is to really meet the demand created by climate change. The Bush folks are putting their money behind a different, less ambitious reactor design.
The last time I spend any time with French nuclear people was April 3, 1986. That was the day Till and his team were testing the safety characteristics of the Argonne reactor design at the Experimental Breeder Reactor II at the INL. French scientists had come to watch what was the leading edge of nuclear technology.
The engineers created the two of most severe accidents for reactors, a loss of pumped coolant flow through the core and a loss of heat removal from the primary cooling system. Either one of these would have caused a meltdown in other reactors.
We were all in the reactor complex with EBRII running at full power, the automatic shutdown equipment turned off. BOOM! A loud crack shook me to my own core as a steam release valve popped open. But the reactor slowly cooled down just as the scientists had predicted.
The Wall Street Journal ran a story about the tests on its front page. The story suggested that the research could trigger a nuclear comeback in the United States.
Three weeks later on April 26, the Chernobyl nuclear accident inside the Soviet Union caused the entire world to second guess the potential of nuclear power. The French and the Japanese, already so committed to nuclear they couldn’t turn on the brakes, kept moving forward.
Only when the idea that global warming could truly be an worldwide crisis did nuclear power begin a comeback in the United States. Its major hurdles are not anti-nuclear politics, though their questions remain significant challenges. Economics and logistics are the primary stumbling blocks for the American nuclear industry.
Areva is tackling the logistics backed by the financial might of the French government. They are making a good profit at it with the help of tax incentives like those presented by the Idaho Legislature.
Whether the United States regains its leadership in this and other alternative so-called clean technologies will depend on the nation’s commitment to the task and its abilities to address the technical and political challenges presented.
»
- Rocky Barker's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
Nuke It
Wow!
An unbias, thoughtful and informative article by Rocky Barker.
RB,
Perhaps you could do us all a great service by writing a series of *unbias* articles about nuke-power . You know, the kind of stuff that an open-minded person at the SRA (if there is such a person) might find helpful.
Rocky Barker is slanted - this story is a red herring...
...he doesn't believe in "unbiased" - says it doesn't exist and neither does free speech on this blog. Barker calls and whines to the blogmaster to remove derogatory comments about his childish reporting.
Who is to blame?
The American nuclear industry killed itself through mismanagement of plant cost, schedules and quality control. In the late '70s and '80s plant construction costs were out of control. Final costs of the last dozen plants to complete were double original estimates. Some plants never completed and converted to coal fired steam to spin their turbines. Lack of quality control was the cause one plant's demise. After spending about $2 Billion dollars building the Zimmer plant in Ohio, it was impossible to certify because of quality control malpractice. It now runs on coal. What will keep the same problems from dogging the nuclear comeback?
"What will keep the same problems from dogging...?"
How about the marketplace?
unbiased
welcome back Martin
Once again you're wrong Mr. Barker...just like your "reporting"
is mostly wrong! I am not Martin and I am not a man. Grow up Barker.
Do we really have to be #1 at EVERYTHING?
That's mildly retarded.
#! at Stupidity, apparently.
When the nukies can tell me how they will guarantee safe disposal of nuclear waste, then we can talk about pursuing it as an alternative to fossil fuels.
Until then, forget it.
Safe Sex Safe Disposal
Which one is really safe?
CG, French reactors process the fuel in a manner called "recycling". What could be more Earth friendly than 'recyling'.
Superman throwing it into the sun.
Are you telling me the
Double post...never mind.
Are you telling me the
Are you telling me the French have found a way to use nuclear power without having to dispose of any radioactive waste? If so, that would be a wonder fuel, and I'd be all for it.
Fuel reprocessing...
Here is a brief overview of the reprocessing process...Fuel Reprocessing
I think the Superman idea is MUCH cooler!
True, but is it
practical? I don't know if you've heard, but Superman fell off his horse and broke his neck and became paralyzed and died a few years ago from an infected bedsore.
He's a CYBORG now, isn't he?
If they brought Roger Thorpe back from the "dead" on The Young and the Restless, I suppose anything could happen...I believe he "died" in a fiery explosion when his speedboat blew up trying to get away from the island where he had held the kidnapped Holly...back in the 1980s or something.
You get bored once in a while.
Bush fell off his rocking horse & broke the nation.
Scott McClellan's book should prove to be interesting. If we heard lies before imagine the lies we'll hear now. I'll bet Dubya is a little angry, nobody dare say bad things about Bush or tell the truth about the current administration. Wonder where they'll find the body, next to Hoffa?
How about Stan Howland, whistleblower/auditor at the Idaho tax commission? He was going to retire in a year & a half, he'll be enjoying early retirement after tooting that whistle. If you've ever stepped on those toes you know what I mean. Giving corporations breaks on taxes when caught not paying while Idaho taxpayers aborb the taxes evaded. The Idaho Tax Commission is hard nose when it comes to an individual, a sweetheart on prom night when corporate money rolls into town.
Otter & the Idaho legislature, investigate? Good luck! You won't hear but a small percentage of the truth or see the money. Stan Howland is going to be a scapegoat or made out to exaggerate. Like the ombudsman at a police shooting denies grieving family justice, the Idaho Tax Commission is going to kick this poor boy to the road ditch. Stan will turn to the public he was standing up for just to be thrown to the wolves. It's a hard lesson Stan, honesty has no place in government.
Nothing crooked going on in Idaho or Washington. Used to be they'd say that about the weather, wait five minutes. If there is an seemingly honest moment in government, it'll soon change because it wasn't real. I've said it before & I'll say it again, you can't swing a dead cat without hitting a crooked as a dog's hind leg politician.
How about No Child Left Behind? What is the fed.'s real agenda? Put eductation in a position of refusing federal funding? Sounds about right, put public schools in a position of refusing federal funding in order to operate public schools so as to provide education. That's how federal government works, con the states out of federal $ through proficient incompetence, {Carl Rove tactics, 101 mislead to the point of states turning away federal $ so feds can have it all.} Terrorist weren't in Iraq, they're in DC, & have been for a long time. Too bad they were on our payroll, representing US!?????????????????
Have at it Bounce. By the way I finally figured out you've never been much into hunting or fishing. The way you promote the give away of America by telling the world America is the best thing since canned beer, it's obvious you never felt the need to keep secret a best fishing hole or hunting spot. Like federal government, we wouldn't want to keep a good thing for US taxpayers, let's promote illegal immigration, free trade, bust unions, hold down wages while breaking health care, Social Security, Medicare, & Medicaid. Campaign finance is just alright?
Wouldn't want the American people who pay 88% of taxes, 50% plus 38% coprorate contributors used to pay, to run the country, fight the wars, pay, provide health care, & retirement to the politicians who take campaign contributions then sell US out, to benefit from all the above. Give it away to illegal immigrants & other countries in free trade. Republican generousity with our money is overwhelming, politicians have a heart as big as the world, at least as big as our pocketbook. Kill thousands of innocent Iraqi women & children by drawing terrorist into Iraq & claim we're doing it all for the survivors we liberated while we're really killing all the terrorist to protect America without fighting them in America. Broke our economy in the mix. Sorry but I'm just a working class American, don't see all the benefit in Bush's plan, genius as it must be.
Why did not Scott McClellan come clean sooner
Because he is butt hurt.
He lost his job.
Did he sit on a radioactive suppository?
Scott has a thread of his own, or make one.
Best career move possible.
Was working for Bush a job or was McClellan Bush's lewinsky like the rest of the world? If it isn't Clinton & his games it's Bush & his, or the next president & hopefully something new, representation maybe. Doubtful, looking at our choices, buy guns & ammo. McCain, we attack Iran if Bush doesn't already have US in that war. Hillary, all bad days. Obama, anybody's guess.
At this point an everyday, crooked as a dog's hind leg politician in the pocket of contributors is our best bet?
I really don't think telling the truth, sooner or later was an option. We're talking about the White House. The American people don't want to hear or know the truth, they want a fairy tale world, somebody telling them how great it is every morning when they get up, reality sucks. Republicans have their version, democrats theirs, & then there's the truth.
Nobody has convinced me yet that we SHOULDN'T lose...
It's like having a job modeling leeches.