- IdahoStatesman.com
- Blogs
- Bronco Beat
- Murph's Turf
- Varsity Extra
- Idaho Newsreader
- Inside Idaho Business
- Commentary: Kevin Richert
- Your Local Government
- Letters from the West
- Into the Outdoors
- Words & Deeds
- The Beer Nut: Patrick Orr
- What's Online
- Nonprofits
- TechIdaho
- The Cinemaniac
- Idaho Politics: LiCalzi
- Idaho Legislature: Labrador
- Idaho Legislature: Langhorst
- Forums
- Recent Posts
- Content
Jim Risch goes shopping for a friendly debate
Submitted by Kevin Richert on Mon, 05/05/2008 - 4:48pm.
I'm always suspicious when candidates start shopping for debates — and a format they like.
And that's what Lt. Gov. Jim Risch is doing this spring, as he picks a KTVB debate with his fellow Republican candidates for U.S. Senate over the traditional, statewide Idaho Public Television debates.
Risch will participate in a May 14 KTVB debate, but he'll skip the Public Television debate on May 22.
Here's what Jason Risch — chairman of the Risch for Senate campaign, and the candidate's son — said in a letter to Elinor Chehey of the League of Women Voters (Scroll down for the full text):
"Your format and rules said that the 'format is fluid' and that 'cross talk' would be permitted. Our experience in that regard has been that the format you chose frequently deteriorates into a negative exchange between the candidates, which is unhelpful and unappreciated by the viewers. ... The 'fluid' format and the 'cross talk' format frequently causes candidates to unnecessarily denigrate another candidate's position rather than focusing in a positive manner on the candidate's own views."
Whew. That was close. Risch — a trial lawyer by training, with going on 30 years of elected public service — nearly walked into a leg trap of "fluid format" and "cross talk." Glad he got out in one piece.
I'm not going to condemn the KTVB debate in advance — although I can only hope the event offers more substance than the legendary Mark Johnson-Larry Craig interview from last October. Then again, the Risch campaign has said it all. For all the campaign's praise of KTVB's debate distribution — via commercial and public TV, radio and the Internet — it certainly reads like the Risch campaign is looking for a debate format scrubbed of all trappings of actual debate.
The KTVB debate will be taped May 14 and aired later, the Associated Press reported Monday. The debate will not be edited prior to airing, says KTVB. Candidates will field questions only from panelists, not from each other.
We've been down this road before. In 2006, Risch spurned a live Idaho Public Television debate during his successful run for lieutenant governor.
I have a dog in this fight. I'm vice president of the Idaho Press Club, the third co-sponsor of the Idaho Public Television-League of Women Voters debates. I'll also be helping with a panel of pundits offering online post-debate analysis of the IPTV debates — and the Senate debate will go on, with or without Risch.
My personal involvement aside, I'm troubled to see a candidate spurning a live debate for a taped version, which allows a campaign ample time for preemptive spin control. And in his search for a friendly format, Risch is being pretty unabashed about his desire to take an easy way out.
Here's the full text of the letter:
Thank you for your invitation to participate in the debate sponsored by The League of Women Voters of Idaho to be filmed by Idaho Public Television on May 22, 2008.
We have selected the debate conducted by KTVB Channel 7 in Boise on May 14, 2008.
We chose to participate in the KTVB debate rather than The League of Women Voters debate because of its format, and because of its wide circulation to Idaho voters.
Your format and rules said that the “format is fluid” and that “cross talk” would be permitted. Our experience in that regard has been that the format you chose frequently deteriorates into a negative exchange between the candidates, which is unhelpful and unappreciated by the viewers. The debate format chosen by KTVB is a disciplined debate designed to keep the candidates
focused on specific answers to issue-oriented questions. We have found widespread and deep appreciation by the viewers for such a format. As you know, we are running a very positive campaign focused on our positions on the issues and we respect other candidacy positions and will not besmirch their stance on the issues. The “fluid” format and the “cross talk” format
frequently causes candidates to unnecessarily denigrate another candidate’s position rather than focusing in a positive manner on the candidate’s own views. We have been told over and over that such a negative tone is not appreciated and is not helpful to viewers trying to evaluate each
candidate.
In addition, our experience with the KTVB debate is such that it receives widespread distribution, and indeed we believe the widest possible. It is broadcast and rebroadcast on channel 7, and it is broadcast and rebroadcast numerous times on channel 28. In addition, the debate is distributed around the state and aired by many other television stations. It is made available to public television and rebroadcast throughout the state on those channels. Finally, it is available on the Internet for people to view at any time of the day they choose.
Over the years we have received very substantial support for the KTVB format and our position on this matter from the citizens of Idaho.
Again, thank you for the invitation.
Very truly yours,
JIM RISCH FOR U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE
By JASON S. RISCH
»
- Kevin Richert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Delicious
Digg
Yahoo
I went shopping for a friendly ghost...
and got a DVD for a dollar.
I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THE RISCH RELUCTANCE...
... AS THE STATESMAN, AND ITS EDITORIAL BOARD. WANT NOTHING MORE THAN TO CRUCIFY HIM ON ANY ISSUE.
IF THE STAESMAN DID ANYTHING MORE THAN PRODUCE SHALLOW EDITORIALS AND SUPERFICIAL "DRIVE BY REPORTING" --- THEN SOMETHING COULD BE SAID FOR YOUR OPINION. THE STATESMAN NEEDS TO PRESENT "BONAFIDE AND BALANCED ELECTIN COVERAGE' FULLY REALIZING THAT THERE ARE "TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY (AND TO EVERY CANDIDATE).
THE STATESMAND DOES NOT NEED TO HAVE A "DOG IN EVERY FIGHT" --- AND THE BEST SERVICE YOU COULD PROVIDE YOUR READERS IS TO PROVIDE A BALANCED, HERE ARE THE VIEWS OF BOTH CANDIDATES (AND WHY) --- SO VOTERS CAN DECIDE. WITHOUT YOUR INFLUENCE
UNTIL THAT HAPPENS (IF EVER) DON'T EXPECT CANDIDATES TO COME RUSHING TO "UNEQUIVICALLY SIGN ON TO BE AT EVERY FORUM OR DEBATE".
ENOUGH SAID.
Totally missed the target
Your comments might make sense if the debate in question involved the Statesman. KR was reporting on Risch dodging the Idaho Public TV-League of Women Voters debate.
OOOH! Rock me Public TV!--Falco missed that one.
Um...
When you write in all-caps, people assume you're a retard and don't bother to read.
But I didn't and...Oh, I see!
The ONE THING Google Groups gets right is the tree system to display posts. The San Jose Mercury News tends to reference posts by number which is also helpful but this could be easier to browse.
NO, I don't care to use del.icio.us, Digg or whatever. I don't need two browsers to look at sites.
>
written.
I know that Austrian born celebrity/rockstar FALCO may be a mystery to some younger readers and maybe more so since he's been dead for a long time like Baltimora but "Rock Me Amadeus" was not only a number 1 Billboard smash in 1985 with the most common version being played being the Canadian remix done by a DJ...
It's a crucial early and later return part of the FIRST well known and recognized 'megamix', a dance monster of a whopping 16 minutes PLUS also featuring Depeche Mode, Orchestral Manoevers In The Dark (OMD), a really wonderful remake of Strwaberry Fields Forever and The Cure.
My being nearly 42 years old (next month) should have anything to do with it if you keep on top of all these things. Belouis Some alone was pretty interesting and Scritti Politti was inspired.
Channel 7 can't run a good rebate either.
Guess you are DOOMED.
Disappointed
I am a Risch supporter, and likely will remain so, but I am disappointed he will not participate in the League of Women Voters debate.
I understand the strategic position of the front-runner and that conventional wisdom advises avoiding fights whenever possible. I also appreciate KTVB for providing its format to get candidate information to the public.
But as a voter, and a member of the Idaho Press Club, especially, I encourage Mr. Risch to reconsider. If he has issues with past debates of this type let us in the Press Club work to solve them and improve the debates.
To exercise personal prior restraint from participating because of the fluid or cross-talk nature of the format assumes in advance an inability of the other candidates to conduct themselves in a proper and dignified manner. This by inference is negative campaigning.
Jim, you should participate in the debate and bring your message to the people. You can positively raise the level of discussion better by being there, and that is exactly what we will ask you to do in the Senate.
Michael Tomlin
League Of Women Agenda Debate
you mean? Risch is wise to skip this one. LOWV debate is nothing but their own agenda driven, not candidate driven.
Agenda driven
If political candidates skipped every debate where they feared they might encounter an agenda there would be no debates.
The point of campaigning is to take your ideas to people who have agendas and try to sway them. I hope our next senator does not skip work in D.C. because the other party has an agenda....we sure won't get very many votes out of him.
Kevin Richert
Poor little fool. How's that 401k? You are so transparent.