Yellowstone's 1988 fires were the signal fires for climate change

Lightning hit a tree on May 24, 1988 and started a fire in the Lamar Valley near Rose Creek.

Yellowstone National Park's first fire of the 1988 season was burning. A few hours later it ended as it had begun - naturally - when rain from the thunderstorm that spawned the fire snuffed it out.

Most of you know the rest.

This year you are going to see a lot of stories about Yellowstone and fire. This year is the 20th anniversary and already we in the media are beginning our 20-year retrospective. Montana television stations, including KBZK are in the middle of their sweeps week presentation and they have a great series on the internet. I’m biased. They tell my story.

The 1988 fires in Yellowstone and across the Northern Rockies were the signal fires.

They signaled that we would live in a different world in the American West at the beginning of the 21st Century. It’s a human world designed for cooler, wetter times.

The Yellowstone fires that burned more than a million acres in and around the park in 1988 were the signal fires of this new world.

Up to 2 million tons of particulates, 4.4 million tons of carbon monoxide, 129 tons of nitrogen oxide and 106 tons of hydrocarbons were released into the air and dropped in the form of air pollution as far away as the East Coast and Amarillo, Texas. Little Enough commercial timber to build 11,000 homes burned in surrounding national forests. Overall the fires cost $140 million, 14 times Yellowstone’s annual budget.

Twenty-five thousand firefighters passed through the fires that season two died, one in plane crash and the other when a tee fell on him. Across the West 6 million acres burned, the most since the agencies began keeping good records in 1960.

The 1988 fire season seemed an aberration. But 1988 set the signal fires for the climate change across the United States. The year 1988 was among the hottest on record.

The drought across North America was the worst since the 1930s. In the former Dust Bowl states from Montana to Nebraska, Kansas and Texas, farmers reported dark clouds of dust again as their topsoil blew away. By June 1 alone, the Soil Conservation Service estimated 12 million acres were damaged by wind erosion.

Record temperatures hit cities across the country. American companies sold 4 million air conditioners and could not keep up with demand. Congress held hearings on the greenhouse effect and global warming. They were told by the nation’s top climatologists that it was likely that the climate was changing and that the burning of fossil fuels was the cause. But they weren’t ready to say they were confident it was happening.

Twenty years later years like 1988 are the norm and even former climate change skeptics acknowledge today the climate is changing and has been changing. In 2006, 9.5 million acres burned followed by 9.3 million acres in 2007. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its 2,500 scientists from around the world have concluded with a certainty of more than 90 percent that the wholesale burning of fossil fuels has contributed the warming, drying and longer fire seasons we are experiencing today.

I covered the fires of 1988 as they started small in May and June then blew up into conflagrations like firefighters had not seen since Aug. 20-21 in 1910. On Black Saturday, August 20,1988, 165,000 acres burned inside Yellowstone. A friend flying over it in a air plane said the convection clouds rising into the stratosphere from the firestorms that were creating their own weather made it appear that Yellowstone was under nuclear attack.

I got caught myself in one of those firestorms at Old Faithful Sept. 7 along with more than 1,000 tourists, rangers, concession employees and firefighters. It was an incredible sight with flames rising more than 200 feet in the air, firebrands as large as your fist blowing by your head and the fire sucking oxygen into its core, creating gale force winds and a noise like dozens of locomotives or a covey of jets flying over our heads.

The fire forced me to run for my life to the relatively safety of the parking lot in front of the historic log Old Faithful Inn.

The Yellowstone fires signaled that nearly 100 years of wildland firefighting, begun in Yellowstone by the U.S. Army on Aug. 20, 1886, had made the forests more flammable and more dangerous.

Foresters convinced Americans to set as a goal putting out all fires, especially removing fire from the ecosystem. Over a century these forests, most so unproductive they would never yield enough wood to pay for their management, filled with fuel, making them harder to protect, not easier.

A team of scientists headed by forest engineer Anthony Westerling of the University of California-Merced released a landmark study in 2007 that says we are experiencing longer fire seasons, larger fires and more big fires because of climate change. The effects of climate change even overwhelmed decades of fire suppression and the build-up of fuel it created.

If it continues, the forests, which today capture 20 to 40 percent of all of the carbon scientists say contributes to the climate’s change, will burn up and turn our forests from net carbon sinks to net carbon sources.
The 1988 fires actually reduced the use of fire to reduce forest fuels. Managers were more cautious even if they supported burning.

It wasn’t until 1994, when 14 firefighters died on Storm King Mountain next to Glenwood Springs Colorado, that the idea of allowing fires to burn once again gained credence, this time for firefighter safety.

Fire bosses began to routinely pull firefighters off of fires to keep them safe. In some high elevation forests, managers used the safety policy to allow fires to spread across the landscape they could never have justified if they said they were letting it burn.

Now with firefighters putting out 98 percent f the fires that start, fire seasons continue get bigger. The Bush Administration has instituted policies that recognize fire belongs on the landscape. They are telling firefighters to let some fires burn, carefully monitored not only for the health of the forest but also to save taxpayer money.

But fire now costs the Forest Service half of its budget and it has to rob from recreation and forest thinning projects to pay for fire. Congress is trying to solve the problem by setting up a big fund to pay for firefighting.

But it is not asking the fundamental question: Is our firefighting system logical?

Americans only joined the century-long debate 20 years ago. It’s taking us all time to catch up.

You confused me with the August 1910 and 1988 references...

and how did this 1910 fire last only TWO days? Did you confuse something and miss it while composing? Please clarify?

clarification

The firestorms lasted two days.

zzzz

Because it has Yellowstone, I thought I would give it a chance. After I woke up from the first paragraph... I realized the headline is L A M E.

"Yellowstone's 1988 fires were the signal fires for climate change"

Yellowstone fires were all about forest fuel management NOT climate change. But if you want two environmental badges for one boring outdated article,,, whatever.

Still trying to sell your book?

Come on Rocky, writing a book 20 years ago makes you a fire expert now? How about the "let it burn" policy that puts tons of pollutants into the air? If you are so concerned about what happened 20 years ago, why are you not concerned about what happened in 2006-2007? You have repeatedly written that you think places like Yellow Pine should be allowed to burn up. So therefore anything you write stinks of bias. How about telling the real story of last year's fires? Nah, that wouldn't sell papers like the lies you printed about us last year...

maybe

maybe 1910 was the signal fire for climate change....

Your headline is ridiculous.