The poverty of TV news

Share    

Since I beat up on the newspapers yesterday, I thought I would address the cultural wasteland of television news today. I find almost all arenas of TV news – local, national, cable, opinion – to be worse than trivial. Much of what is covered, and how it is covered, by television is actually detrimental to the well-being of our society. The only question is: Where to begin?

How about local news? I have seen the deterioration of local TV news in the Treasure Valley just in the last 15 years. The Boise stations now have followed the mantra of other big-city stations: “If it bleeds, it leads.” The local television news has become little more than a reading of the police blotter. Why is it that every petty crime is considered newsworthy? And if it involves sex, and especially sex with minors, it has to be covered ad nauseum. Do we really have to hear about some pervert who was arrested for trying to videotape up women’s skirts in the mall? Is that really important? Luckily, there are plenty of car accidents and house fires to fill in the rest of the newscast, not to mention a good 10 minutes on the weather. I feel sorry for the sports commentators. There are no local sport stories. (Sorry, Bronco Nation, but one good season in one sport by one institution does not make a good sports town.)

Where are the stories on issues that affect our lives? What are the state legislature, city councils and county commissioners doing? For that matter, what is going on in our schools? How is our tax money being spent? One story a month on these issues is not enough.

One can criticize the newspaper reporters in town but any of them is immensely more knowledgeable than any TV reporter at a local station. While a TV reporter may cover the state legislature a couple of days during the session, in between child molesting and car accident stories, reporters like Betsy Russell, John Miller, Nathaniel Hoffman, Jared Hopkins and Heath Druzin are spending every day of the session covering the developments of the state Legislature while also learning about the state government and how it works. Read their stories if you want to learn something yourself.

The national TV news media is not much better. The “evening” newscasts have one or two important stories then go soft with the human interest tripe. All TV news is nothing more than a reading of the headlines in the newspaper. They do not seem to have the time, inclination or ability to provide any real analysis of events or situations. Election campaigns are worse. There is never time to talk about issues (that is hard work and makes my head hurt), but there is always time for the horse race. Who is ahead? Who is gaining? Of course, the gaffe or screw-up is always the top story, but I will get to that on Thursday.

Maybe the worst of them all is cable news. Why do they believe that two people who disagree with each other screaming, interrupting and making unsubstantiated remarks is supposed to be enlightening? Oh wait, it isn’t supposed to be enlightening. It is supposed to entertain in a manner similar to the gladiators, circuses and feeding Christians to the lions did in Roman times. The problem, at least for me, is that very few of the people on cable news are entertaining. Keith Olbermann is witty but why does he have to interview the same hack journalists every night? Bill O’Reilly is so full of himself I may need to get a wide screen TV set in order for his head to fit. Lou Dobbs, that old fat blowhard, seems to think you can fill a whole show with nothing but xenophobia. Anderson Cooper, Megyn Kelly, Bill Hemmer and Campbell Brown are nice eye candy but that isn’t why I tune in.

Alas, there was only one truly intelligent TV show with a host who everyone knew was smarter than all of the viewers. I certainly do miss “Firing Line” and William F. Buckley.

Happy Earth Day.

Go Yotes.

Dr. Jasper M. LiCalzi
Professor
Department of Political Economy
The College of Idaho

Right on target

Do you think they will listen? Not a snow balls chance in you now where.

Spot on!

.

Generalists vs. Specialists

A huge difference between local market newspapers and local market television is the assignment of their reporters. The Idaho Statesman is able to have a few specialists on staff to cover and become knowledgeable about schooling, business, local government, the arts, state government, etc.

Local television reporters - other than weather and sports, are generalists. They must cover each and every story regardless of their knowledge of the industry, event, or endeavor.

To their credit they sometimes bring in an economist or political analyst, such as this blog's host, but day in and day out they report on a myriad topics for which they could not be expected to have expertise.

I am pretty forgiving too when I see that many of them are very young, and Boise is a tv stopping off point in their career world.

Poverty of Guest Writers

"Much of what is covered, and how it is covered, by television is actually detrimental to the well-being of our society."

Professor, What do you want in a minute and half clip?
Detrimental??? So providing a quick snapshot of the day's news is detrimental? You wrote yourself it is the headlines. That is detrimental?

Please write about how detrimental bad professors are when they clog the academic airwaves of students who want to learn something?

*****************
"They do not seem to have the time, inclination or ability to provide any real analysis of events or situations."

No kidding??? They do not have the TIME.

That is why there are other more in depth TV programs for news , like 60 minutes, 20/20 (not so newsy anymore) and Public TV programs like Frontline, NOVA, Charlie Rose, etc. And of course the cable programs which you also look down on.

And the count/counter-point of hot-air blowers is no different than a newspaper op ed section. It's all the same stuff.

*****

Professor,
One main point you failed to mention is TV news, local and national, has a unique advantage over print-- it's called a video "picture". No newpaper can tell the story of a weaping victim, or a proud sport champion, or liing politician quite like a video journalist can.

No, local Noose hangs.

Then stupid people get after their 15 repeated newscasts of fame.

I dig Edgar Linares though. He's a decent reporter, may make a nice anchor someday.

Word of the Day

LiCalzi you forgot to metion the always entertaining satiristic cable news shows. If someone is going to watch TV in the first place an episode of the Daily Show or the Corbert Report is often a more entertaining than any of the dribble that writers pass off for sitcoms or dramas.

The genre of entertaining news shows is a growing one, media outlets like the Onion are growing, perhpas your media coverage should include this new type of newscast.

If 57 channels have nothing on...

why vegetate all day on this stupid box?

get a bike!

I couldn't agree more...

I generally only watch the first 10 minutes of the local newscast just to see if anything important has happened, then I turn the TV OFF!